User talk:Clintonesque
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 13:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello! You've removed a recently added user warning template from your user or user talk page. This tends to give the impression that you didn't read it. User warning templates contain valuable information and although you may disagree, it's best if you consider them. Thank you. Freepsbane 01:39, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re"Hypocricy"
you posted in my talkpage a while back Please stop your hypocrtical POV pushing. You have inserted the words "Official allegations" in the 2003 Iraq War Info box, please do not describe my labeling of allegations that not all deaths are reported as "weasel words". Clintonesque 02:50, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
my reply is The term official allegations is simply a technical term, the reasons provided for the war have at least informally shifted. That said please try to maintain Wikipedia:Civility accusing other editors of being hypocrites is hardly constructive, and remember that Wikipedia:No personal attacks is an enforced policy. thank you Freepsbane 11:52, 31 October 2006 (UTC) Furthermore the fact that deaths inevitably go unreported is fact of war, and with the current chaos it is well acknowledged that all bodies are not found right away.Freepsbane 12:01, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fallujah 3RR
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing.
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] you have broken the Wikipedia:Three-revert rule, any such futher reverts will lead to a block.Freepsbane 21:51, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Civility
Remember the NPA attack policy, you have no reason to react hostilely to warning tags I have placed on the talk if you have actually violated the rules, furthermore additionally if you have not noticed you have made more than 3 reverts in a mere 24 hours, if I were so inclined I could have reported such to an administrator, my use of talckpage warnings was simply for good faith. Finaly I have removed you’re retaliatory warning on the grounds that I have come nowhere near braking the 3rr rule on any page remember false talk page accusations are tantamount to vandalism.Freepsbane 03:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] You and User:Freepsbane
Hi. Freepsbane asked me to look at your interactions with him and I see they have been less than cordial. The solution I propose is that both of you:
- Refrain from editing each others' talk pages for a month. Instead you may commmunicate through me, or any other admin who wants to get involved. This should be easy if you also both agree to
- Discuss any proposed changes in articles you have both edited in talk first and obtain consensus for those changes
- Refrain from edit-warring over the Fallujah article. I'd like you both to observe WP:1RR on that article please
Do you accept? I'm copying this to him as well. All the best, --Guinnog 00:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for your quick reply. I think this is the best way forward and I'm glad you agree. --Guinnog 00:55, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
