Talk:Client/SOA
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Ripoff
This article is mostly a ripoff from this article http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/02/15/two-kinds-of-ajax-html-vs-client-soa/
It should either be deleted or rewritten. --itpastorn 09:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Non-notable
I think this article should be put up for deletetion.
- The article seems to be mostly a "buzzword soup" that makes little technical sense.
- The phrase "Client SOA" gets only about 900 hits on Google, many of which are clones of this article.
- It was created by User:Idearat, who has since either deleted himself (how would you do that?), or been deleted from Wikipedia's user base.
- It has changed little since he created it - mostly people applying Wikifications to the styling and muddying the wording a little more, here and there.
- Most of the others who have contributed to this article have done so anonymously, without comment, and many of those have not contributed much else to WP
I really think this was somebody's techy 'vanity page'. If he goes on top make millions out of his idea, then it'll deserve an article on WP. In the meantime...
Has anybody here got a good reason why it should not be put up for deletion? --Nigelj 21:57, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
My name is Mike Price mike_e_price@hotmail.com
On item number one above I think lots of useful articles use buzzwords to varying degrees. I think buzzwords are a type of technical shorthand and are useful as long as people use them relatively consistently. Maybe I don't understand what you mean by buzzword. It seems to me that moving processing to the client makes technical sense but with the proper consideration for application specific trade-offs.
As far as not knowing who the author is or the author being deleted or there not being a lot of Google hits doesn't necessariy mean that tcitation requestedhe idea should be deleted does it.
At the bottom of the page several products are listed with the implication that they provide or support this Client SOA capability. I actually got to this page from the TIBET page www.technicalpursuit.com which I found referenced in abook entitled "Foundations of AJAX".
Are you saying this article should be deleted because the notion of Client SOA is not feasible or that there are better resources to read about it. If it is not feasible then I would like to know more about why. If there are better resources discussing this notion of moving SOA capability from the server to the Client then I would like to know what they are. Or maybe you think the term Client SOA is not the best name for the concept and maybe you have reasons there should be a better name. I would like to more about this.
- Sources definitely need to be located to support the definitions and assertions in this article. -- Beland 15:17, 11 August 2006 (UTC)