Talk:Clarinet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Echo has identified Clarinet as a foreign language featured article. You may be able to improve this article with information from the Serbian or German language Wikipedias.

A Wikipedian removed Clarinet from the good article list. There are suggestions below for improving areas to satisfy the good article criteria. Once the objections are addressed, renominate the article as a good article. If you disagree with the objections, you can seek a review. Removal date: 8 November 2006

Clarinet is a former good article candidate. There are suggestions below for which areas need improvement to satisfy the good article criteria. Once the objections are addressed, the article can be renominated as a good article. If you disagree with the objections, you can seek a review. Date of review: 19 November 2006

It strikes me as odd that the "more common" Bb clarinet's picture does not appear as the main picture of the page. There's plenty of room for more pictures - they would be useful, given the large amount of text. But if did a search for clarinet, and wanted to associate an image with one, it would be fair to associate the common accepted image of the generic clarinet, would it not? And save the bass's and contrabass's and alto's for later?

Um. Contrabass and contra-alto clarinets are not that rare, not at all.

But in an article called "clarinet," would it not be more common to see the Bb or A pictured, as they don't require a modifier such as "contrabass" or "contralto?" Also, please don't forget to sign your posts! -Markmtl 18:53, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

I agree that the main picture in the article should be of a Bb clarinet, with other pictures lower down and then "qualified". Regarding the contrabass and contra-alto clarinet, they may not be "rare" strictly speaking, they are certainly are less common than say the Bb, Bb Bass, Eb, Eb alto, A, etc. and should be noted as such. -- Ithacagorges -Ithacagorges 01:37, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

I've removed this:

The clarinet was invented in Nuremberg, Germany on January 14, 1690.

I'd like to see a source for that - such a precise date seems extraordinary. The concise Grove says "The earliest mention of the clarinet is in an order dated 1710". --Camembert

OK, I poked around a bit and found [1] and http://spider.georgetowncollege.edu/music/burnette/Mus215/clarinet.htm], which both put the invention at or around 1690, though neither gives an exact date. So I've put some info back in, but not put the exact date back - I don't know how you'd come up with such precision anyway - when you do invent something? When you have the idea? When you begin making it? When you finish? Something else? Anyway, I doubt it's a great loss. --Camembert

Ugh, forget all that - it's explained much better in the history section of this article anyway. As the history section says "about 1700", I've removed the above quoted conflicting passage from the article. Now I need to go to bed... --Camembert

Why is "thumb rest" a euphemism? I've never heard any other term for it. Paul Richter 08:47, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Nor I. It's perhaps a bit of a misnomer: the weight of the clarinet sits on the thumb, so the thumb is doing no resting: we might call the thumb a clarinet rest. -- Nunh-huh 08:51, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Contents 1 I would like to know 2 Common types? 3 Edits edits edits 4 Samples 5 Manufacturers 6 Range 7 Terminology 8 Alto in F presently made? 9 rsholmes's edit of 25 Feb 2006 10 Etymology 11 In reference to modern reappearence in Jazz and other Jazz musics 12 Saxonette 13 Octocontra 14 Basset horn as Masonic icon 15 [The] practice of using a variety of clarinets to achieve colouristic variety 16 The Music-Web Music Encyclopedia Clarinet Page 17 GA Re-Review and In-line citations 18 Five easy pieces 19 Family members 20 Template & extended family links 21 Reasons for GA Delisting 22 Failed GA nomination

[edit] I would like to know

I would like to know the metaphors used for describing Clarinet its mellow but how does it else sound?

It would be nice if we could get a recording up. Are there public domain recordings of the clarinet somewhere? I could record myself, but I really don't have good recording equipment, and I am not an accomplished player Notthe9 02:51, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

This type of language is not very clear; perhaps it would be better to describe the tone of the clarinet by its various characterizations or how it has actually been used rather than vague, poetic metaphors and euphemisms. What do you think on this topic? -Markmtl 18:52, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Common types?

The article claims "The most common varieties of clarinet are the standard B flat and A Soprano instruments." In my experience, both the Bb Bass and Eb Alto have seemed easily as common. Is my experience the exception? Notthe9 02:51, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

Yes, it is the exception. If you look at surviving instruments from the historical period as well as instrumentation from the last 200 years, it is clear that the soprano clarinets are the most commonly used. This is not to say that lower-pitched clarinets are not used, or are not common. Certainly I think that this warrants more clarity in the "usage" section, since (for example) a lot of contemporary works make frequent use of the bass clarinet. -Markmtl 18:53, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

• Basses and altos are certainly common in wind ensembles, and basses can be found with frequency in large orchestras, but compared to normal clarinets the amount of commonimity is pretty tiny. Melodia Chaconne 9 July 2005 19:12 (UTC)

[edit] Edits edits edits

I think this article could use a bit more organization throughout. Additionally, many notes seem to be thoroughly unencyclopedic (See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not). Here are a few examples:

-"Some people find the sound of the A clarinet to be just a little more rich and mysterious than a B flat, though the difference is small. Today, the chief use of an A clarinet is to make the key signature of a piece simpler." This is not a particularly useful piece of information; what is meant by "rich" or "mysterious?" Who purports this to be true? Today A clarinets are more often used to achieve the extra semitone at the bottom of the range. Historically, certainly A, Bb, C, D and Eb soprano clarinets were used to facilitate key signatures, but only three of these has survived in common use. This is important to point out!!: The Boehm and german systems have been considered chromatic instruments since at least the turn of the century (the 2nd-viennese school scored all clarinet parts in C or D, for example)

-the section starting with "Beginning clarinetists often choose soft reeds - 2 to 2 1/2. . . " see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, particularly "Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought." This section might be more appropriate in Wikibooks.

-The "Range" section could be made much clearer with a staff image as describing the intervals is quite confusing (as accurate as it is!); "unknown" upper limits in the range are described quite adequately in numerous orchestration textbooks that can be cited, as this should not be left so mysterious. (Example: many composers and orchestrators consider anything above a written altissimo g to be in the "extreme" register. Certainly we can think of many players facile in this region, but these players need to be named.

-"One major manufacturer makes professional clarinets from a composite mixture of plastic resin and wood chips. . . " Is it Buffet? It's okay to say so. And it's not quite a mixture of "resin and wood chips." That could be clarified. Some readers might take "student instrument" as a value judgement (in addition to being unclear). I'd suggest "low-priced" instruments. I know, I know, "student" instrument is the vernacular, but Wikipedia's job is not to hierarchize instrument manufacture.

-I would recommend that we use the "construction and acoustics" section as its own section, as there is plenty of room (and much editing to be done!) in reference to fingering systems and acoustical principles. (Ex: "This hourglass figure is not visible to the naked eye, but helps in the resonance of the sound." is too vague when it can be explained in more direct, concrete terms; "The bell is at the bottom of the instrument and flares out to spread the tone evenly." doesn't quite make sense.

-"The highest notes on a clarinet can have a piercing quality and can be difficult to tune precisely." This paragraph needs a lot of work or just deletion; it's POV (Stravinsky liked high woodwind timbres), it's unsourced, it almost reads like a manual (which is fine, but not encyclopedic). why the long explanation about tuning altissimo notes? Should this belong in the range section?

-"Finally, the flared end is known as the bell, which amplifies the sound." This paragraph is based on misunderstood acoustic principles. Except for e and b', vibrations are emitted mostly from the tone holes of the instrument.

-"Usage and repertoire" could be made more concise and is far from complete. an excellent start...should we attempt at a "standard repertoire" list or might it be more prudent to link to other specifically repertoire-oriented websites?

-"Family" section... a few minor edits; "E♭ Sopranino . . . The piercing quality of this smaller clarinet carries well in outdoor situations." This last comment is a little weird, especially considering that ALL clarinets gained wide usage from their ability to project in outdoor settings (french revolution bands, harmoniemusik, etc.); a lot of these don't need their own bullet points (if there's enough information for any of them, we can create new articles, esp. bass clarinet, alto clarinet, basset horn). Otherwise i think a final bullet point listing "obscure or obsolete" would be sufficient.

-"History" section could use some citations and is very orchestra-centric.

Otherwise this is a VERY good start! Please let me know what you think of my suggestions; most of the editing beyond grammar and usage I will not continue with before posting for discussion. Markmtl 18:53, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Samples

Anyone else want to add links to online performances, as I did for bass and contra?

Conversely, anyone think this is bad and want to yank them back out?--SarekOfVulcan 17:40, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

That's not a bad idea. I'd watch out for copyright issues though. Bcem2 02:19, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Manufacturers

There are many, many more mouthpiece and reed manufacturers than those listed here. And if the line about "selective list of present-day (instrument) manufacturers" is to be deleted, there are many, many more present-day and past clarinet makers too. Is it really useful to attach all these lists to an already-lengthy and somewhat unwieldy article? Would it not be better simply to provide an external link to pages with this information? (I have pages with selective lists of present-day clarinet and mouthpiece makers that could be linked to, and there probably are others.) The point is not to create an exhaustive treatise on the clarinet but to give basic information and citations of more comprehensive sources.

[edit] Range

I am a clarinetist and have a couple of questions about the "Range" section. 1. While naming a top note in the range of a woodwind instrument is somewhat arbitrary, I have always considered the highest note in the "standard" range of the clarinet to be the C three octaves above middle C. My limited experience with the classical literature is that anything above a G is rare, however. 2. The range of every type of clarinet except bass begins on the written low E. The statement that this is the case for soprano Bb clarinet is slightly misleading. I'd like to know others with a broader knowledge of the instrument and its variations have found on these points. Special-T 18:11, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Most (though not all) B-flat clarinets have written E as their lowest note; a few instruments go to E-flat. As far as I know, practically all other soprano and higher clarinets also go down to E. On the basset clarinet the lowest note usually is C, likewise the basset horn. On the alto clarinet the lowest note usually is E-flat, though some instruments only go to E. On the bass clarinet E-flat is commonly the lowest note for older and student instruments, while newer professional instruments usually go down to C. On the contra-alto and contrabass clarinets some instruments go to E-flat, some to D, some to C. I believe the octocontra instruments all were built to go to C. -- Rsholmes 18:23, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

How about something like:

Nearly all soprano (A, Bb, C, Eb) clarinets have keywork enabling them to play the E below middle C as their lowest (written) note. Alto (Eb) and bass (Bb, A) clarinets have an extra key to allow a low (written) Eb. Professional quality bass clarinets generally have additional keywork to low C. Among the less commonly encountered members of the clarinet family, contra-alto (Eb) and contrabass (Bb) clarinets may have keywork to low Eb, D, or C. The basset clarinet and basset horn generally go to low C. Special-T 19:22, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

That's probably an improvement. My only quibbles are that "professional" probably should be "modern professional", and that your text omits mention of the admittedly rarer (though not as rare as A basses) clarinets in G, D, and Ab, as well as even rarer beasts in odd keys and registers (e.g. the octocontras, though arguably they're not worth mentioning here). Anyway, the parenthesized key information isn't really needed; it's found elsewhere on the page, as well as on pages that could be linked to.

(In the process of writing this up I've discovered I seem to have been wrong in my impressions of what the commonest terminology for the smaller clarinets is. See below.)

So maybe something like (modulo whether or not to distinguish sopranino and piccolo):

Nearly all soprano, sopranino, and piccolo clarinets have keywork enabling them to play the E below middle C as their lowest (written) note. Alto and bass clarinets have an extra key to allow a low (written) Eb. Modern professional quality bass clarinets generally have additional keywork to low C. Among the less commonly encountered members of the clarinet family, contra-alto and contrabass clarinets may have keywork to low Eb, D, or C. The basset clarinet and basset horn generally go to low C.

Or maybe the same without the links, I don't know. -- Rsholmes 21:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

I like that pretty well; I'll put it in. I've been trying to clarify sections of articles that, while trying to explain a possibly confusing aspect of the subject, start including all of the rare exceptions right off the bat or emphasize tangential subjects. Any views on the top-end range stuff? Special-T 22:48, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Actually, I'll try to separate the "written range & keywork" issue from the transposing issue in that paragraph before I insert this. Special-T 22:52, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Terminology

I've found some surprises lately when trying to figure out what terminology (if any) ought to be presented as standard for the various sizes of clarinets, particularly on the high end. Of course not everone agrees. Even individual companies don't. Here's something from Selmer France that uses "sopranino" to refer to the Eb clarinet, which supports what I thought was best, though the same document uses "contralto clarinet", which I've argued against; however, the Leblanc France site uses "soprano" for Eb, and "contra-alto". Selmer Paris agrees on both counts. (Of course both companies are divisions of Conn-Selmer.)

Some data:

Instrument	Leblanc France	Selmer Paris	Yamaha	Google hits
Ab clarinet	Ab sopranino clarinet	-	-	Ab piccolo clarinet: 15,900; Ab sopranino clarinet: 303
Eb clarinet	Eb soprano clarinet	Eb soprano clarinet	Eb soprano clarinet	Eb soprano clarinet: 14,100; Eb sopranino clarinet: 447
D clarinet	D soprano clarinet	D soprano clarinet	-	D soprano clarinet: 70; D sopranino clarinet: 2
C clarinet	C soprano clarinet	C clarinet and C soprano clarinet	-
Bb clarinet	Bb soprano clarinet	Bb clarinet	Bb clarinet
A clarinet	A soprano clarinet	A clarinet	A clarinet

Meanwhile at Grove Music Online (subscription) we have: Piccolo or octave clarinets (in C, Bb, A, Ab); Sopranino clarinets (in G, F, E, Eb, D); Soprano clarinets (in C, B, Bb, A, Ab, G); Basset-horns (in G, F, D); Alto clarinets (in F, Eb); Bass clarinets (in C, Bb, A); Contrabass (pedal) clarinets (in Eb, Bb). The only other producers of Ab clarinets I know of are L.A. Ripamonti, who call it a piccolo clarinet; and Schwenk und Seggelke, who call it a high clarinet.

So what do we do? For Ab "piccolo" is by far the more popular as judged by Google hits, though "sopranino" makes sense if Eb and D are "soprano", and that seems to be what almost everyone except Grove says. I thought Grove was authoritative, but they seem to be off base on this.

I've reorganized the "extended family" section in light of the above information. Also trimmed back some of the verbiage under "bass clarinet" and moved it to the bass clarinet article. -- Rsholmes

[edit] Alto in F presently made?

I've deleted the following sentence pending verification: "Some examples of extended range (to written low C) alto clarinets in F are presently manufactured." -- Rsholmes

[edit] rsholmes's edit of 25 Feb 2006

I've made an edit that needs to be summarized in more detail than would make sense in the Edit Summary.

The unhelpful clarinet lesson by 81.2.95.250 was reverted.

A cross reference to the "Extended family" section was linkified (and the title of the latter had its capitalization changed for consistency).

A lot of verbiage in the "Tone" section had nothing to do with tone. Most of it was redundant with text in later sections; one bit was moved to the "Uses" section. The rest was deleted.

Some more composers' names were linkified.

Several references to list articles were consolidated into a "See also" section.

Madraven's comment about use of the G clarinet in 19th century Schrammelmusik was removed, for a couple of reasons. First, the significance of this use was deemed too minor to justify its inclusion in an already lengthy overview article. Second, the G clarinet used in Schrammelmusik was a high G clarinet, classified by Shackleton as a sopranino and just slightly larger than the piccolo A-flat; the G clarinet entry in the "Extended family" list refers to a low G soprano clarinet, between and A clarinet and a basset horn in size. Actually I moved this text to the soprano clarinet article (though arguably, if like most people we spurn Shackleton's use of "sopranino", the high G might more sensibly be classified as a piccolo clarinet. This is one reaon I like Shackleton's terminology, but it seems too unpopular to be adopted here.) -- Rsholmes

[edit] Etymology

I reverted because I believe the claim

The name derives from adding the suffix -et meaning little to the Italian word clari meaning clear.

is incorrect etymology and the previous/current

The name derives from adding the suffix -et meaning little to the Italian word clarino meaning trumpet, as the first clarinets had a strident tone similar to that of a trumpet.

is correct. If the former etymology is correct and the latter is incorrect, please supply an authoritative citation. -- Rsholmes 14:36, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] In reference to modern reappearence in Jazz and other Jazz musics

In more recent years modern jazz musicians have been plugging the clarinet back into the music it once was more predominate in. I suggest that that be mentioned along with modern artists like Don Byron and others who have led this movement (which it is almost too small to call).

[edit] Saxonette

WHAT ABOUT THE SAXONETTE?? where does that fit in? user: POLLUX, Bb & Bb Bass nota bene: see http://hem.passagen.se/eriahl/saxonette.htm for more info

Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to…) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. Mak (talk) 22:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Nothing spammy about that link, and thanks for the boilerplate. Ever considered maybe they didn't "improve" the article because they don't know the answer to the question they're raising?

I don't know either. A "saxonette" is merely a soprano clarinet with curved, metal neck and bell, similar to those of an alto or bass clarinet. These shouldn't change the essential nature of the instrument. In particular the upturned bell is irrelevant except for the lowest couple of notes. I've seen the saxonette described as intended for jazz use, and I've also seen it described as a clarinet for marching bands. I don't know what its original intent was -- maybe the original intent was to make something novel-looking in hopes of generating sales. -- Rsholmes 02:13, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Octocontra

I've removed the phrase ", and is in the personal collection of George Leblanc" pending verification. I have seen this statement repeated often (and have repeated it myself) but lately I have my doubts about it. Does such a person as George Leblanc even exist? The obituary of the octocontrabass's apparent previous owner, Léon Leblanc, mentions only his wife as a survivor. -- Rsholmes 19:14, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Basset horn as Masonic icon

A bit of info that might add to the article is the use of the basset horn by the Masons. Also the writings that Mozart did for the basset horn in connection with his own membership in the organization. A link to the basset horn in reference to this idea might be helpful.

Never heard about this; can you cite a source? Sounds interesting. Might better be mentioned in the basset horn article though. -- Rsholmes 18:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm working on the source, it was in a book at my old university and I haven't been back yet. It would probably fit better in the basset horn section but a brief mention in the main clarinet section might be helpful to the untrained user. Here is an un-verified internet link that has the basic idea [2]

[edit] [The] practice of using a variety of clarinets to achieve colouristic variety

The 'Classical Music' section states that "However, many clarinetists and conductors prefer to play parts originally written for obscure instruments such as the C or D clarinets on B♭ or E♭ clarinets, which are of better quality and more prevalent and accessible." This doesn't seem quite to make sense to me, and I can't quite get at what the editor meant by this (possibly because I suspect I disagree with it). Can someone explain to me what it means so that I/they can rephrase it, or otherwise make a convincing case for it to stay? ;) njan 18:40, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

I believe it means that clarinetists routinely play C or D clarinet parts on the more standard-issue Bb or Eb horns. Special-T 18:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

And I've just re-read it to that meaning and it's made complete sense.. D'oh! I think perhaps I've had too much coffee this afternoon. Or perhaps not enough! njan 19:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

That sentence could be clearer - it sounds as if it were translated out of English and then back again. Special-T 23:13, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Music-Web Music Encyclopedia Clarinet Page

I had a look at the recently-linked Music-Web Music Encyclopedia Clarinet Page, and am not at all impressed. I find misplaced apostrophes, inconsistent flat notation, misspelled "basset", the incorrect claim that "the clarinet in Bb has the largest range of all the woodwind instruments", and an introduction that is low on information and high on bad attempts to describe the sound of a clarinet. Clicking on through to Bass clarinet in Bb and A brings up a piece of text that might be excusable in a high school music assignment -- maybe. Looking around further, Mozart Leopold is textually identical to this (older) page. No credit is given. I started writing this paragraph looking to get opinions about keeping this link, but after finding this clear evidence of plagiarism I have no doubt it should be deleted. -- Rsholmes 01:23, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

I am a member of the site (under name Shiva) and have worked with MaestroX along with some others to produce this article. So some of the work that may be "plagiarism" may have been contributed by an other member. MaestroX is great guy and is only trying to create a good resource for other people and for free.

Anyway on to the article. I think the majority of the page is very good, as you mention there are gramatical errors which need sorted. But overall it gives good advice for both playing and writing for the instrument. I have left a note on the articles talk page (Music-Web Clarinet Talk Page) to offer some support to proof read the article.

As regards to the "Mozart Leopold" article, it seems the issue as been resolved. When the project was just strating out the site had not been fully functional, so many of what is on the site was written and sent into MaestroX by email. So please don't blame him for that.

Thanks for discussing this,

Clarinet Player 16:13, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

The music-web site may someday be a great resource. It isn't there yet. No surprise: apparently the project was only just begun in August of this year.

I see the Leopold Mozart article has been pulled. The history shows it was posted by MaestroX; if the text was given to him by someone else, he apparently didn't check on it, nor did he attribute his source. And there is more text lifted from the karadar.com site; the "Abe, Keiko" page, for instance. I going to make a guess that virtually all of the composer articles were taken from the karadar.com site.

The clarinet article has more than grammatical errors; it has errors of fact. The clarinet history article is taken without attribution from http://hem.passagen.se/eriahl/history.htm. In the clarinet maintenance section, most of the passage on mouthpieces is taken without attribution from here. The mouthpiece cleaning section is taken from here and the storing reeds section is from here.

The bass clarinet article, besides being an example of bad writing style, is very poorly researched.

To paraphrase someone or other, what's original isn't good, and what's good isn't original. -- Rsholmes 18:01, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

I agree, in fairness the article is good but needs work. Maybe in the future when the article is better it will be great to link to it then. Until then, i'll inform other contributors of Music-Web about copyright issues and notify them of the errors that need correcting. Thanks for discussing this. I think we have came to a good agreement.

Just a note, maybe some of the other links here also need checked for quality, and content. I see one was deleted that I agreed needed deleting too, maybe the others are not up to scratch. What you think?

Clarinet Player 19:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Wondering why the link of the oboe article was rejected Clarinet Player 10:32, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Because the site is still full of what appears to be plagiarized material. Compare for example the very article you linked with [3]. -- Rsholmes 13:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA Re-Review and In-line citations

Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. Agne 03:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Five easy pieces

why do clarinets come in five pieces,

I understand the mouthpiece and barrel being seperate, but why five pieces? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.20.108.151 (talk • contribs) 12 Oct 2006.

Not all of them do. Often the small clarinets (e.g. E-flat) are in four pieces: mouthpiece, barrel, single joint, and bell. Also most metal clarinets do not come apart in the middle.

There are usually two joints (top, for the left hand keys, and bottom, for the right) mainly, I believe, for ease of building and because it's easier to get two good quality short pieces of wood than one long one. That doesn't apply as much to plastic of course, but plastic instruments are modelled after wood ones. Another benefit to having two joints is they can be pulled apart slightly for tuning if needed. As for the bell, since it's wider, if it were made in one piece with the joint, you'd have to start with a long, thick piece of wood and waste most of it.

A brief explanation of this might be a good addition to the article, but I'd want my impressions verified by an authoritative source before including them. -- Rsholmes 14:26, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Family members

The additional information on various clarinet family members is welcome, but I would advocate keeping the list in this overly-long article brief and putting these details into the individual articles on the various family members. A few comments on some of this information:

• In the classification shown here, the instruments in high F and G are mentioned as soprano clarinets, so they should be discussed in that article, not as piccolo clarinets. (Or the classification should be revised, but not without first discussing it here.)

• Verification, please. It may well be true that some composers used to write for both E flat and D clarinets in the same piece, but I can't recall having heard of any. Nor have I ever heard -- though it may be true -- that clarinetists have ever commonly equipped themselves with both. Please cite authoritative sources. Some sources also, please, for the claim that E flat clarinets are more common and better quality than D clarinets. Is this true globally or only in America/Western Europe?

• More specificity, please. Which composers wrote for both E flat and D clarinets depending on key signature? Which composers / which operas call for A, B flat, and C clarinets?

• Should the Italian pitch names be capitalized? (Do, re, mi are not in English; but C, D, E usually are.) And are they really "mib" and "lab", or should they be "mi♭" and "la♭"?

-- Rsholmes 03:51, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

I've moved the aforementioned material to the individual articles on the respective family members. In addition, I've copied the "Extended family" section to a new clarinet family page and added to it -- in particular, I've made note of Rendall's classification scheme in addition to Shackleton's. I made a link to that here. The list here could now, I think, be shortened to mention only the more significant family members (which I would say are the A♭, E♭, D, C, B♭, A, A basset, G, F basset horn, E♭ alto, B♭ bass, EE♭ contra-alto, BB♭ contrabass, EEE♭ octocontra-alto, and BBB♭ octocontrabass -- the latter two aren't really significant, but I'd say too interesting to omit). But let's hear comments before doing that. -- Rsholmes 03:01, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template & extended family links

Excellent idea to move info on the extended clarinet family to its own set of articles; I think it fixed the 'sprawling article' problem. I like the template as well. At the risk of creating more sprawl, I'd add Don Byron. - Special-T 13:24, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

There's still a good deal of sprawl, and maybe some of the other sections could profitably be moved to separate articles with a short summary left here. I'm not too familiar with modern jazz saxophonists so I'll let others comment on the appropriateness of adding Byron to the template (see Template_talk:Clarinet). -- Rsholmes 14:12, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reasons for GA Delisting

This article's GA status has been revoked because it fails criterion 2. b. of 'What is a Good Article?', which states;

(b) the citation of its sources using inline citations is required (this criterion is disputed by editors on Physics and Mathematics pages who have proposed a subject-specific guideline on citation, as well as some other editors — see talk page).

LuciferMorgan 00:45, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Failed GA nomination

This article contains no inline citations which are a requirement of Good Articles. As such, its nomination has failed.--TheEmulatorGuy 02:42, 19 November 2006 (UTC)