Talk:City
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reasons:
- "Introduction" should be merged with the actual introduction
- Three images shouldn't be stacked in such a way - causing the layout to be unpleasant
- Captions of pictures should be of matching quality as of the first picture
- "The city is a human habitat that allows people to form relations with others at various levels of intimacy while remaining entirely anonymous." (This definition was the subject of an exhibition at the Israeli pavilion at the 2000 Venice Biennale of architecture) The "definition" should be either inline citationed or reworded, but that's dire
- "The difference between towns and cities" should appear later in the article, not the first paragraph for readers because it is not the most important subject of the article
- Incorporate "Inner city" section with all American information, as well as mentioning "Edge Cities"
- Delete large section of "See also", most is covered/made inferior by the category box at the bottom of the article
- Completely expand and revamp "References"
- Synthesize "External Links", some links are useless, Eg - A forum where one can participate with other forumers using stats, images and general debate to rate and compare cities in a civilised fashion. while others need names cleaned up to be of any use to the reader Eg - For each country, part of its population that lives in its most populous city
This article is a good start, but has a long way to go.. Highway 22:42, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] I have added a picture of an European city
I have added a picture of the very well known city of Sabadell (next to Barcelona, in Catalonia, Spain). I think it's good to show both faces of what we understand as city: by one side, the cold and inhuman face of city shown in the great cities of the United States, Canada, and some of the big cities of Europe, and Asia, etc. By the other side, I think it's good to show an image of a normal city, a warm and cool city. The face of the technology and the modernity and the face of the tradition and the cultural and social factor that a city plays to put together their citizens.
Onofre Bouvila 22:54, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
Alston says this type of thing shouldn't be here, it should be in Wiktionary? Is this correct? It's very good though ;)
I've decided to redirect "City" to "Central Business District", because the latter word is the proper definition of the area.
(from JustAnyone) I thought it would be good to have a set of information about a city that includes how things work.
I'm surprised that in a list such as list of cities in Oklahoma it seems that any place in the US with a population of more than 1,000 is a city; anything less is a town. In the UK somewhere with only 1,000 people would be called a village. Is this nomenclature correct? Shantavira 18:26, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
What's up with the link to the toki pona 'pedia at the bottom of the page? It doesn't seem to be working too well...who is running that 'pedia anyways? — Braaropolis | Talk 05:11, 25 May 2004 (UTC)
- Not sure of the details, but according to recent mailing list discussion toki pona is now being treated as a lesser pedia than others. Klingon is also in this "lesser" category. "Proper" wikipedias are not to link to these "lesser" ones. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 12:05, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Perhaps a merger or disambiguation or alternative use is in order, see the City and The_City_(book_by_Maximilian_Weber). --Piotrus 10:11, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- I've made The City a disambiguation page, and added appropiate see alsos to this page. I think everyone should be able to find what they are looking for with this set-up. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 12:05, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I removed the text below from the opening of the article. I honestly don't understand what it means or what it refers to. older≠wiser 13:01, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Definition of City: A fixed place of human habitation that allows people to form relations with others at various level of intimacy, while remaining entirely anonymous. (Presented at the Israeli pavillion at the 7th Venice Biennale. Exhibition curated by Architect Hillel Schocken)
[edit] Size of a city
The fact that you don't understand something does not mean it is not worthwhile for you to search. Look up http://www.intbau.org/essay5.htm and you might find some sense in that definition.
Hillel Schocken
"I removed the text below from the opening of the article. I honestly don't understand what it means or what it refers to. older≠wiser 13:01, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Definition of City: A fixed place of human habitation that allows people to form relations with others at various level of intimacy, while remaining entirely anonymous. (Presented at the Israeli pavillion at the 7th Venice Biennale. Exhibition curated by Architect Hillel Schocken)"
[edit] "City" as used by Americans.
I always felt that there was some similarity between how Americans use "city" and how the King James Version of the Bible uses it - may there be a connection?--PeterR 23:11, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Modern Conceptions
The "Modern Conceptions" section is not entirely credible. Who is taking this approach? Is this how most people conceive of cities, or is it a theory developed and held by a few academics? The entire section is written in the passive voice, and that's the lazy way to try to be authoritative without actually citing any authorities. More fundamentally, does this particular theory of urban function/development belong in the "Cities" article, or does it deserve its own article (i.e., "The x Theory of Urban Function")? LaurenceJA 01:54, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I have been bold and removed the entire section. It was:
- unencyclopedic
- POV
- unreferenced
- vague
However, I don't want to discourage the author, and I would like to thank them for contributing their time and energy to the article. Wikipedia tolerates unreferenced claims but generally the more academic, abstract or controversial the topic becomes, the more important it is for the contribution to be verifiable against sources.
Ben Arnold 23:55, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Global cities
I removed the Indian cities from the list of "global cities". They're very big cities but, frankly, they don't fit the description given. They're all recognisably Indian. I also removed KL. It just doesn't fit the bill either. I'm not that convinced by the cities listed as it is but I don't want to tread on toes by removing those whose claim is rather spurious. Is Seoul really a "global city" though? J'burg? Toronto!? Is Toronto more closely part of the global network of big cities than it is part of Canada? Not sure about that. Philip Arthur 03:43, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Definition
Isn't the (maybe old) definition of city a town with a cathedral?
- Yes, that was one definition, now obsolete. A city, by its etymology, is any "group of citizens" and hence any place where such a group settles. The nuanced distinction between "city" and "town" are relatively recent in origin. Of note, the most likely decent of this word comes from words implying a settlement with a fortification or defensive works, so a distinction between a "city" and either a "hamlet" or a "village" would be more valid. Just my opinion, though.
- Also my opinion, English is a living language and attempts (like those running rampant on this talk page) to cement a single, eternal, adamantine meaning to a word are follies. People in Hoboken talk of a trip into the city, as do my family in southern Kansas. The first are referring to New York City, the second are speaking of Cedar Vale. Both groups understand the word in context. An encyclopaedic article can be written which encompasses both. Kevin/Last1in 20:23, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Montreal photo??
Don't understand why this article should open with a photo of Montreal. Could somebody place it better or remove it? Thanks. Cribananda 22:16, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Becuase it is a good example of a modern, large and post industrial city relevant to the conext of todays history as an example, and as a visual representation of the article Bmgoau 06:12, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
It's atleast better placed now. That's fine. Cribananda 05:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Nonsense
What is the nonsensical rubbish about what Americans think "city" means supposed to be all about? "Greater Los Angeles" certainly includes other cities and villages than LA, but the city of LA has over 3 million people, Greater LA, which has no legal status, has like 12 million. If Greater Birmingham has 2M, fine, but to say that if Birmingham, England were in the US, it would have over 2M ppl is -- nonsense. Who writes this crap? Tomertalk 15:14, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
- I agree and removed that part about LA's population. Population of the actual city(that is, within city limits) is actually 3 million, not 1M.--Chicbicyclist 08:01, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Village, Town, City, Metropolis
MY DEFINITIONS
Settlement- less than 100 people
Village- at least 100
Town- at least 1,000
City- at least 20,000
Metropolis- at least 100,000
[edit] Needs verification
I took out the following sentance because i am quite sure that this is not true, because several cities, for example in chine had populations of about 1 million.
But if i am wrong correct me...
"It is estimated that ancient Rome had a population of around 1 million people by the end of the last century BCE, which is widely considered the only city to reach that number until the Industrial Revolution. "
NEEDS VERIFICATION
by Nsae Comp 7.6.06 about 19:35 greenwich
- No city in ancient or medieval china had 1 million people, that was because such cities did not have the technology and the economic infraestructure to sustain such huge population, most medieval chinese capitals had about 200,000 to 300,000 inhabitants.--RafaelG 01:54, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] rent levels
This article needs info on rent levels, which are simultaneously crucial in determining how a city develops and determined by the development. --Espoo 13:50, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] How to count the size of a city?
As you see on these two stats, Stockholm count way more more area size than Copenhagen. And Copenhagen only need to add like 300 m2, to be bigger populated.
Stockholm:
- Population City: 765 044, 4091 inhabitants/km2, Area Size: 187 km2
- Population Urban Area: 1 212 196, 3230 inhabitants/km2, Area Size: 375 km2
- Population Metro Area: 1 872 900, 289 inhabitants/km2 Area Size: 6 490 km2
Copenhagen:
- Population City: 502 362, 5709 inhabitants/km2, Area Size: 88 km2
- Population Urban Area: 1 085 813. ?? inhabitants/km2, ?? Area Size:
- Population Metro Area: 1 827 239, 638 inhabitants/km2, Area Size: 2 862 km2
So witch city is biggest?
--194.255.124.250 23:01, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cathedral
What about something I heard (perhaps apocryphal?) that a European city can only be defined as such if it contains a cathedral? Thus, Vinci is a city as despite its tiny population and size, it contains a cathedral, and so forth. I'd be grateful for clarification.
[edit] City Lists
Are there any lists of cities by prominent geographical feature (coast, lake shore, island, peninsula, river(s), etc)? fiberglassdolphin 20:53, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The photos
I notice both photos illustrating that article show cities from the USA. Is that normal? I think there should also be a slight diversification in the nature of the pictures: why should only towns with skyscrapers figure? I know plenty of "cities" (very important ones too) that don't have skyscrapers: London, Paris... No, definitely, the two photos show a slight bias in favour of the US. Daniel Montin 17:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Categories: Former good article nominees | Wikipedia CD Selection | B-Class core topic articles | Wikipedia Version 0.5 | Wikipedia CD Selection-0.5 | Wikipedia Release Version | B-Class Version 0.5 articles | Geography Version 0.5 articles | B-Class Version 0.7 articles | Geography Version 0.7 articles | WikiProject Cities articles