City of Indianapolis v. Edmond

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

City of Indianapolis v. Edmond

Supreme Court of the United States

Argued October 3, 2000
Decided November 28, 2000


Full case name:	City of Indianapolis, et al. v. James Edmond, et al.

Citations:	531 U.S. 32; 121 S. Ct. 447; 148 L. Ed. 2d 333; 2000 U.S. LEXIS 8084; 69 U.S.L.W. 4009; 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Service 9549; 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 6401; 14 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 9

Prior history:	On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Holding

Police may not conduct roadblocks "whose primary purpose is to detect evidence of ordinary criminal wrongdoing." Such roadblocks must have a specific primary purpose, such as keeping roadways safe from impaired drivers, or enforcing border security.

Court membership

Chief Justice: William Rehnquist
Associate Justices: John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer

Case opinions

Majority by: O'Connor
Joined by: Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
Dissent by: Rehnquist
Joined by: Thomas, Scalia (only part I)
Dissent by: Thomas

Laws applied

U.S. Const.

City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000)^[1], was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States limited the power of law enforcement to conduct suspicionless searches, specifically, using drug-sniffing dogs at roadblocks. Previous Supreme Court decisions had given the police power to create roadblocks for the purposes of border security (United States v. Martinez-Fuerte), and removing drunk drivers from the road (Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz). This decision stated that the power was limited to situations in which the search was "designed to serve special needs, beyond the normal need for law enforcement."

The opinion was delivered by Justice O'Connor, joined by Justices Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer.

Chief Justice Rehnquist delivered a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Thomas joined, and Justice Scalia joined as to part I.

Justice Thomas also filed a separate dissent.