User:Ciriii

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Today is December 16, 2006.

This user maintains a strict policy advising against all personal attacks.

This user believes that only articles need reflect a NPOV, and that displaying political, religious, or other beliefs using userboxes and user categories should not be banned.

I TEND TO RAMBLE!

EDIT DON'T REVERT I will never revert a page that has been edited in good faith. If someone has something to say, even if 99% of the populace disagree it probably is still relevant. This is where there is no consensus between wikepedians:

NPOV vs. POV : Actually Wikepedia's policy on Neutrality is rather contradictory to itself and can be read in two ways. 1) Avoid any opinions and include only fact 2} Include all fact, and represent all opinions. Since there is no way to decide which facts are correct and which are mere opinions, the second one seems logical, and unlike other encyclopaedias this one has the added bonus of a discussions page where you can often see nationalistic, local or egoistic pride shine! And form an objective view of your own.

Editing, NOT reverting, is usually the bst way when a big addition has taken place. I bet you can find something worthy in every edit...look hard! Otherwise those trying to Be Bold...will eventually give in! What is the point in constant reverts, a revert war...only one opinion being promulgated! That is not objectivity, nor beneficial.

NATIONALISTIC PRIDE IN ARTICLES IS DAFT No matter what the old wives tales say..you cannot change historical fact, even with revisionism, the French forces didn't win at Agincourt, Germany did not win world war II, The British Empire didn't ultimitely become a galactic force and Andorra doesn't rule the world!! You cannot dismiss someone becuase of their birthplace.

This user lives in the United Kingdom.

UK	This user uses British English.

This user lives in England.

This user is proud to be English.

derbyshire

This user is from Derbyshire, "The Peak District"

My name's Christopher. I have a degree in history, specialising in European political and Royal from about 400 to 1500 and classical theological history. I have a real interest in pure politics and theology too. These are all pretty intermingled though.

Religiosly, I am an Arian (not Aryan) However, despite this, I would not class myself as Christian. I keenly embrace the other religions of the world, and I am not opposed to the idea that there was a time before god.

[edit] My Contributions, Etc>>>

[[1]]

Wikipedia:Babel

en	This user is a native speaker of English.

ang-2

Þes brūcere cann forðian mid middelre mǣðe Englisces.

cy-2

Fe all y defnyddiwr 'ma cyfrannu ar lefel ganolradd y Gymraeg.

de-3

Dieser Benutzer hat sehr gute Deutschkenntnisse.

es-3

Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel avanzado de español.

fr-4

Cet utilisateur parle français à un niveau comparable à la langue maternelle.

la-2

Hic usor media latinitate contribuere potest.

...

This user would like to be able to speak more languages.

Search user languages

Userboxes

AmE-0

This user does not understand the American English language and bloody well doesn't want to.

blz

This user can speak blazon.

du-1

This user does not wish to speak or hear dumbass, but is resigned to the necessity of at least understanding it in an environment of massive collaboration.

LE-1

This user's been known to screw up the occasional sentence and make the occasional typo, but is otherwise pretty accurate with regards to English.

ubx-5

This user uses entirely too many userboxes.

prog-0

This user doesn't program, but knows that writing XHTML is not programming.

…in.

Ending a sentence with a preposition is something this user is okay with.