Talk:CIA cryptonym
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
An anonymous user objects:
- (my $0.02: I believe LCFLUTTER refers to Polygraph techniques and not to truth serums)
-
- But polygraph techniques are mentioned plainly in referenced texts.
I would just like to express my amusement that this article has been edited almost exclusively by anonymous users. Isomorphic 09:40, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- Damn. Now you're telling me! Too late to use a proxy, though. :-)
- Anyway, this usenet post seems to have some insider's information: [1]. Should we use it ? Bogdan | Talk 18:06, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Isn't MOCKINGBIRD also a cryptonym? Guaka 20:59, 14 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Why'd the definitions of the digraphs get killed? 68.39.174.39 02:07, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Seems to me that I read that "KURIOT" (that is: "KU-RIOT") was a digraph for the CIA itself (maybe the watch center or something like that...) Wierd thing is that "Kuriot" itself is a word (Russian,I think)...for what it's worth...
[edit] Context
Could someone please clean up this article to provide context for what it's saying? - Richardcavell 05:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)