User talk:Chisinau

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, per ruling of administrators, Jimbo Wales and/or the Arbitration Committee. See the block log.

The user has been tolerated or some time, until his behavior became disruptive. `'mikka (t) 23:15, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

---

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Moldovans. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Zserghei 19:31, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Moldovans are romanians. Why you think is vandalism? Because is true?

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Moldovans, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Zserghei 19:43, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

You vandalize the pages. I can ask the romanian admins to block you.

Don't remove templates from Anti-Romanian discrimination.

Please do not remove maintenance notices from articles unless the required changes have been made to the article. If you are uncertain whether the article requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the article's talk page before removing the notice from the article. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. Thank you. --Zserghei 19:46, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Contents 1 Warnings 2 Reply 3 Romanians 4 Do I know who Mauco is? 5 Reply 6 3RR warning

[edit] Warnings

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. Don't revert Republic of Moldova, Moldovans, Demographics of Ukraine, etc. --Zserghei 19:59, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Please stop trolling with personal accusations, or you will be blocked from editing. mikka (t) 20:23, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

do i have the right to edit my page? yes or not? I have. So, go away troll.

Yes, you have. Don't play games with me. This time it will be much shorter. mikka (t) 20:26, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

This is your third warning: don't remove technical templates. mikka (t) 20:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

This is your fourth warning: one more violation, and you will be blocked. mikka (t) 20:30, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

but don't you see how idiotic it sounds? if i add the template on your page do you have the right to deleted or not? if you delete it i warn you: don't remove technical templates.

I repeat once more: there will be no games with you. mikka (t) 20:34, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

read what other had said.

Account blocked for 24h for trolling. mikka (t) 20:36, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

FUCK YOU WITH YOUR BLOCKING AND WITH YOUR ANTI-ROMANIAN FRIENDS! DO YOU UNDERSTAND? SO BE IT!!

[edit] Reply

I was going to reply about how you, I, or the pope have yet to prove how we may interpret official and, for all purpuses, objective census data. I was also going to demand why you have to influence every single piece of data that contains a certain word, when the very purpose of linked words is to get one to the article containing all the controversy. I was always going to ask you where you got the nerve to imply that all arguments brought against your views from all sides count as "little debate".

But then, I noticed what you have on your page. I'm not going to rv your edits now, since all you do is get into a new revert war. But please, don't bother polluting my page with a reply. Dahn 12:28, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

I will not pollute your page, don't worry. I see a very arrogant man in front of me. --Chisinau 12:32, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

What can I say. Despite the fact that the arrogance of your tone doesn't pester me at all, and you try to destroy any form of communication, I will try to make a link to your mind and thaughts. --Chisinau 12:35, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

When you say objective census data, you make a mistake. Why must that be objective? And I will strictly refer to Moldovan Census. And you know you can't trust a pro-russian Gvt. of Moldova. Remember how Voronin came to power? He promised to make from russian the official language, strong ties with Russia.

[edit] Romanians

Buna! Am vazut ca ai scris ca sunt in lume 34 de milioane de Romani. Da, ai dreptate, dar trebuia sa facem ceva ca astia sa nu ne mai reverteze pagina. Eu am deja niste surse pt a dovedi, dar ne trebuie si mai multe, si trebuie sa negociem cat mai mult cu iei. Nu cred in nici un caz ca sunt mai putin de 30 mil. Romani in toata lumea. Mai ales in State, cred ca sunt vreo 2 mil, de Spania si Italia sa nu mai vb, peste un milion fara discutie, iar de Canada, in jur 400 mii. Asa ca sa cauti cat mai multe surse poti ca se le putem dovedi, si mai ales, sa negociem cu ie si sa nu ii lasam sa face ce vrea. Numai bine, NorbertArthur 15 Aprilie 2006

La ce adresa pot sa-ti scriu? Eu am gasit ceva surse si in cateva zile daca totul merge bine le pun pe pagina. Sunt in Spania si Italia peste 1 milion de romani. Cu acte vorbesc. --Chisinau 15:02, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Buna! Scuze ca iti rasp asa de tarziu, dar eu lucrez sambata si acuma am venit de la lucru. Da, in sfarsit am gasit si eu pe cineva care are mintea la loc si care judeca ca in lume sunt peste 30 de milioane de Romani. Auzi, fii atent ca astia nu le place deloc ce facem acolo si ce sustinem. Uite ce au facut cu el pt ca sustinea adevarul despre diaspora romana:user:Romania, user:Iasi, User:Romanian. Pe toate trei este aceelasi utilizator, dar l'ai blocat pt ce sustinea despre diaspora romaneasca. Mie poti sa imi scrii pe adresa mea, user:NorbertArthur. Am si eu cateva surse pt USA, Canada si Italia. Problema este urmatoarea: eu am incercat sa le pun pe pagina, dar le-au luat jos, si cand am cerut explicatii, am fost blocat de asta. Eu te ajut cat pot, si daca ai probleme sau ceva de genul asta, contacteaza-ma si voi fi acolo. Uite, poti sa vb si cu el, colaborez foarte mult cu el si este de aceeasi parere ca si noi si e tare de treaba. Deci, ne trebuie surse. Eu iti promit ca voi caute cat de multe pot eu. Toate cele bune si pe curand, NorbertArthur 15 April 2006

Stai linistit ca-l pun eu la punct pe Khokhoi ala.

NorbertArthur 15 Aprilie 2006

[edit] Do I know who Mauco is?

I don't understand that question. I only know Mauco by his username and the brief interaction that we have had while developing several articles, especially Transnistria. TSO1D 16:19, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reply

What you're doing is called "block evasion" and "disruption", Bonaparte. What ever happened to the whole PhD thing? --Khoikhoi 17:55, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Seriously Bonny, you're not fooling anyone. You know your edits are going to be reverted anyways, as always. Come on. --Khoikhoi 18:00, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

At least I'm improving the encyclopedia, you're just trying to add all your Greater Romania POV into it, which is not acceptable. --Khoikhoi 18:06, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Your improvements are in vain, my friend. They will be reverted by someone other than myself some time today. --Khoikhoi 18:11, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

I know that the Moldovans are the same people as Romanians as well, but it's not acceptable to add that to Wikipedia, because you'd be POV-pushing. --Khoikhoi 18:18, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

I never said anything about offending everyone. And you know the situation with Moldovans and Romanians is different than the example you provided. Look, in the Moldovan 2004 Census, only 55% of Moldovans reported Romanian as a mother tongue - it's not our job to correct people by saying they're Romanians. This is a neutral encyclopedia, and we have to state both sides, no matter how much you may not like it. Let the reader decide if they're the same people, it's already obvious. It's not necessary to shove it in their faces. —Khoikhoi 18:28, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

You still don't see the problem? Let me say it again, let the reader decide, it's already obvious. The problem is that we'd be going in according to the Romanian POV, and this is a NPOV encyclopedia. —Khoikhoi 18:40, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

You still don't get it, and I'm just wasting my time explaining it to you. Good bye. —Khoikhoi 18:49, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Chisinau, tu cine esti? de unde esti (nu cred ca de la chisinau) ? Romanii nu sunt 34 de mil. Poti sa-mi zici si mie de unde ai venit cu cifra asta. Ethonologue ne pune la 23.5 mil deci individul de care vorbesti nu aduce cele mai mici cifre. Constantzeanu 19:52, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Daca aduni cei 19.4 mil din romania cu 2.64 mil din moldova, cu 400.000 din ucraina cu 200.000 in serbia care sunt de fapt grosul romanimii vei vedea ca suntem cam 22.640.000 in romania si in jurul ei, da?

la asta mai adauga cam 500.000 in SUA, vreo 100.000-200.000 in Canada si cei 200.000 din Rusia, Uzbekistan si Khazahstan si ajungi la ca, 23.5. Mai pune Germania, Franta, Italia si Spania (dar fara insa sa-i pui si pe muncitorii sezoniali care ce-i drept sunt vreo 2 mil dar nu sunt rezidenti permanenti in tarile astea si i-am pus deja la scoteala in recensamantul romanesc) si ajungi cam la 24.5 mil. deci unde e problma?Constantzeanu 20:02, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

si nu prea inteleg cum de un manual de "geogra" de clasa a 7-ea ar da cifre cu privire la numarul etnicilor romani. poate il tragi la vre-un scaner si i-mi arati si mie.Constantzeanu 20:07, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR warning

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. --—Khoikhoi 20:04, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

I will take care but you started this. So much to speak with you so much time. --Chisinau 20:05, 15 April 2006 (UTC)