From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to pre-Columbian Mesoamerica, its civilizations, history, accomplishments and other topics. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page. |
Some shared resources and guidelines for editing Mesoamerica-related articles: (click "show" to expand)
Guidelines— Outline of suggested guidelines and editing conventions
References— Selected resources and compendia of Mesoamerican sources and studies
Citations— Bibliography and pre-filled citations for Mesoamerican sources
Worklists— Project worklists and activities
|
NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritising and managing its workload. |
B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. |
Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the Project's importance scale. |
|
This article is also supported by the WikiProject Aztec sub-project. |
WikiProject Mesoamerica priority open tasks: (click "show" to expand)
|
[edit] "Floating garden"?
mmh.. there is a common misconception here... Chinampas were intended to be artifical islands, but sometimes currents erode the base and they became "floating garden"...
There were to types of chinampas.. Some were dedicated to agriculture, and others were dedicated for living, the material for the last inlcude heavier materials, like rock, and debris form other contruction . Tenochtitlan really was a giant chinampa and continuosly grew on extention by this system. Nanahuatzin 22:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- You're right, Nanahuatzin, although I think their description here as "floating gardens" is meant to be more evocative than literal- they 'appeared as if they were floating'. The article does go on to say they were artificial islands, but I agree that some rewrite is in order to make it more clear.--cjllw | TALK 07:32, 15 June 2006 (UTC)