Chinas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Chinas or Ciñas are a people mentioned in ancient Indian literature from the first millenium BC, such as the Mahabharata, Laws of Manu, as well the Puranic literature. They are believed to have been Chinese.
Contents |
[edit] Etymology
The name China or Cina is believed to have been derived from either the Qin (Tsin or Chin) dynasty which rule in China from 221 BCE[1] or the earlier Qin state which later became the Qin dynasty. If it is referring to the Qin dynasty, this forms a limit on the antiquity of the above references in question. Qin (Tsin or Chin) was the ancient appellation of the northern province of Shen-sy, and this may have reached the Hindus from thence at an earlier period (Dr Wilson).
[edit] Mahabharata
In the epic of the Mahabharata, the Chinas appear together with the Kiratas among the armies of king Bhagadatta of Pragjyotisa (Assam). In the Sabhaparvan, the same king is said to be surrounded the Kiratas, and the Cinas. Also in the Bhismaparvan, the army of Bhagadatta is said to consist of the Kirtas and the "yellow-colored" Cinas.
Bhishamaparva of Mahabharata also lists the Cinas with the Mlechha tribes of the north like the Yavanas, Kambojas, Kuntalas, Hunas, Parasikas, Darunas, Ramanas, Dasamalikas [2]. These verses date to fifth century AD when the Hunas came into contact with Sassanian dynasty of Persia
Shantiparvan of Mahabharata groups the Cinas with the barbarous tribes of the Uttarapatha viz the Yavanas, Kiratas, Gandharas, Shabras, Barbaras, Shakas, Tusharas, Kanakas, Pahlavas, Andhras, Madrakas, Ramathas, and the Kambojas and states them as living the lives of Dasyus. These verses of epic expect these tribes to perform certain duties which are different from those performed by the Brahmanas, Kshatriyas, Vaisyas, and Sudras [3].
Vanaparvan of the Mahabharata states that the territory of the Cinas can be reached by a land-route across the country of the Kiratas in the mountain regions of the north.
[edit] Ramayana
Kiskindhakanda of Valmiki's Ramayana makes reference to Cinas as well as Parama-Cinas and associates them with the trans-Himalayan tribes of the Daradas, Kambojas, the Yavanas, the Sakas, the Kiratas, the Bahlikas, the Rishikas, and the Tañkanas of the Uttarapatha. [4].
The epic literature asserts that the Cinas, Khasas, Hunas, Shakas, Kambojas, Yavanas, Pahlavas, Kiratas, Sinhalas, Mlechchas etc were created by sage Vashistha through the divine powers of cow Sabala or Nandini (Kamdhenu) [5].
[edit] Puranas
In the Kalika Purana, the Cinas are again grouped with the Kambojas, Shakas, Khasas and the Barabaras etc and are said to have sided with Buddhist king Kali in the war against Vedic king Kalika [6].
Bhuvanakosha section of numerous Puranas locates the Cinas along with the Tusharas, Pahlavas, Kambojas, and Barbaras in the Udichya or northern division of ancient India. [7].
According to Vayu Purana and the Matsya Purana, the Cinas and several other tribes would be annihilated by king Kalika or Pramiti at the end of Kali age [8].
In the Matsya Purana, the Chinas are said to be unfit for performing shraddhah.<Matsya Purana, 16.16</ref>.
There is yet another reference to China as Cina-maru as referred to in the Vayu Purana and Brahmanda Purana. However, at the same place, Matsya Purana mentions Vira-maru. China-maru or Vira-maru has been identified with the lands of Turkestan situated above And-khui in the north of Afghanistan (Dr K. P. Jayswal, Dr M. R. Singh).
[edit] Buddhist literature
The Cinas also find reference in the Buddhist play, Mudrarakshasa, where they are listed with other contemporary tribes, such as the Shakas, Yavanas, Kiratas, Cambojas, Bhalikas, Parasikas, Khasas, Gandharas, Kalutas, etc.
Buddhist text Milindapanho (see: Sacred Books of the East, xxxvi, 204), associates the Chinas with the Sakas, Yavanas, Kambojas and Vilatas(?) etc, and locates them in the western Tibet/Ladakh, according to Dr Michael Witzel [9].
[edit] Other literature
Chanakya (c. 350-283 BC), the prime minister of the Maurya Empire and a professor at Takshashila University, refers to Chinese silk as "cinamsuka" (Chinese silk dress) and "cinapatta" (Chinese silk bundle) in his Arthashastra.[10]
The Sanmoha Tantra speaks of the Tantric culture of the foreign countries like the Bahlika (Bactria), Kirata, Bhota (Tibet), Cina, Maha-Cina, Parasika, Airaka, Kamboja, Huna, Yavana, Gandhara and Nepala.
Around the 2nd century BC, the Laws of Manu describes the downfall of the Chinas, as well as many foreign groups in India:
- "43. But in consequence of the omission of the sacred rites, and of their not consulting Brahmanas, the following tribes of Kshatriyas have gradually sunk in this world to the condition of Shudras;
- 44. (Viz.) the Paundrakas, the Chodas, the Dravidas, the Kambojas, the Yavanas, the Shakas, the Paradas, the Pahlavas, the Chinas, the Kiratas, the Daradas and the Khashas." [11]
Besides China and Parama-China, there is also a reference to Mahachina in the Manasollasa which text mentions the fabrics from Mahachina.[12] It is thus possible that China probably referred to western Tibet or Ladakh, Mahachina to Tibet proper, and Parama-China to Mainland China.
[edit] References
- ^ Geographical Data in Early Puranas, 1972, p172, Dr M. R. Singh
- ^ MBH 6/9/65-66
- ^ MBH 12/65/13-15
- ^ The Ramayana of Valmiki: An Epic of Ancient India, Volume 4, Kiskindhakanda, p 151, Rosalind Lefeber
- ^ Ramayana (1.52-55) & Mahabharata (1.174.6-48)
- ^ Kalika Purana 20/40
- ^ ":ete desha Udichyastu
- Kambojashchaiva Dardashchaiva Barbarashcha Angaukikah || 47 ||
- Chinashchaiva Tusharashcha Pahlavadhayata narah || 48 ||
- — (Brahma Purana 27.44-53)"
- ^ Vayu I, 58.78-83; Matsya 114.51.58
- ^ Early East Iran, And The Atharvaveda, 1980, (Persica-9), p 106, Dr Michael Witzel.
- ^ Tan Chung (1998). A Sino-Indian Perspective for India-China Understanding.
- ^ Manusmritti (Laws of Manu), X.43-44
- ^ Op cit, 1972, p p 172, Dr M. R. Singh.
