User talk:CheeseDreams
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Multi-licensed into the public domain | ||
| I agree to multi-license my eligible text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under the GFDL and into the public domain. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions in the public domain, please check the multi-licensing guide. | ||
Contents |
[edit] Archive
I think the last two archives were probably meant to be /January 2005 and /February 2005, were they not? At any rate, have fun on Slashdot. Wesley 18:08, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
You should note that I am still here.
[edit] Comments on the following
It's also very easy to figure out where you are posting to. And we can block proxies. Are you suggesting that you will vandalise Wikipedia on purpose? If so, I'll add this to your arbcom page. - Ta bu shi da yu 20:28, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I am suggesting to others how to do it. CheeseDreams 20:34, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Out of interest, how is slashdot a wiki? - Ta bu shi da yu 20:31, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I think they ment that if we adopted more Slashdot-similar rules than we would "truly" be a wiki. ✏ OvenFresh² 23:43, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Slashdot#Karma -- CheeseDreams
- N.b. note another important point - the random assignation of administrator priveledge.
[edit] E-mail
Do you have an Email address (I'd like to talk to you)--Wrongemboyo 02:01, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Yes I do. And no, I'm not giving it out.
[edit] Blocking
For your information, as a result of your publishing your password, it has been changed to prevent misuse and all your CheeseDreams accounts have been blocked, jguk 15:17, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Somewhat slower than I was expecting, to be honest.
[edit] Injunctions
Please see Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/CheeseDreams_2#Temporary_injunctions. -- sannse (talk) 16:18, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Arbitration case - final decision
A decision has been reached in the arbitration case relating to you. You are to be banned for 6 months for disregard for previous rulings by the arbitration committee; 3 months for abuse of Wikipedia processes and procedures; 3 months for abuse of sockpuppet accounts; and 6 months for significant disruption, relating to a dispute with User:Rienzo. Bans will run consecutively to a maximum of one year. In the case of the ban for significant disruption, which is effective immediately, any edits by either you or Rienzo that continue this conflict by attempting to implicate each other will result in the ban being reset for both of you.
- Thats what I was wanting, darling. Now I can get Rienzo banned whenever I want.
-
- Don't u bet on it, darling! ;-) Rienzo 11:31, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Should you return after successful completion of your bans, you will be restricted to editing from the account User:CheeseDreams and subject to further restrictions on starting on starting Requests for Comment or Arbitration. For further details and the full decision please see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CheeseDreams 2#Final decision -- sannse (talk) 15:53, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
A year plus! You really did need to be silenced, darling. Email me at drzen1 AT gmail DOT com if you want a chat any time.-- Dr Zen
Darling, they have been hiding from truth for centuries, I don't expect them to be willing to face it now. Truth is bitter and cold. -- CheeseDreams$
[edit] A short note to the Cabal
It is quite easy to rig up a browser to give out a fake (and freely chosen) IP address on flicking a switch.
There has been only one of me so far. There will be many more.
You cannot win. The truth will always be the truth no matter what you do.
You have a choice.
Either you retain your authoritarian tyranny, and wikipedia becomes a laughing stock and dies.
Or you scrap it, and institute a system like Slashdot#Karma, that is truly wiki.
CheeseDreams 19:29, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, we are an encyclopedia first, and a community second. People who push a POV, and do it badly, likely find their work on here undone. That's just the way it works. - Ta bu shi da yu 02:49, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] A short note to CheeseDreams
Blocking you is kind of like the whack a mole game. Fun, yet pointless. - Ta bu shi da yu 02:17, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Not a sock puppet
I am not a sock puppet. At first I thought it more ammusing than anoying that you accused me of being so, but when I discovered that you were claiming I was on Rienzos page and that the arb comitee had agreed that I should be banned if he (or any of his other 'known' sockpuppets) commited an act of vandalism. I have edited his page to make a clear distinction between what has been agreed on by the arb comitee and what is your opinion. If there is a problem with this could we please solve it through official chanels instead of starting and edit war? KalevTait 08:36, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Moderndocumenthypothesis.jpg
Hi, it says you are a sockpuppet of Cheese dreams; this is just a note to let you know that I've just used paint to change the image you, or rather Cheese dreams, uploaded, due to an editorial remark in the text of Documentary hypothesis pointing out that it is slightly wrong (missing an arrow). Unfortunately it has come out slightly blurred (and slightly blue), so could you do the change (add an arrow from JE to P) yourself on the original and upload it instead? --francis 20:15, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Account blocked
I was forced to block this account indefinitely upon learning its password had been compromised. Before (if) the ban expires, please use the password reset feature to assign a new password to yourself. JRM · Talk 17:23, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- No e-mail address has been set, so the password for this account cannot be reset. I have logged in and altered the password to one only I know. Sorry for the inconvenience, but this account cannot be used again. JRM logged in as CheeseDreams 17:33, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
