Talk:Chembai

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chembai article.
Please sign and date your posts using four tildes (~~~~). New discussion topics go at the bottom of the page; click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Frequently asked questions. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Talk page guidelines Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Don't bite the newcomers!

Chembai has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (see comments)
More information about this article... ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] See comments

Chembai is a former good article candidate. There are suggestions below for which areas need improvement to satisfy the good article criteria. Once the objections are addressed, the article can be renominated as a good article. If you disagree with the objections, you can seek a review. Date of review: 14 December 2006

Archives

1 2

[edit] Peer Review comments

Hi, please list down suggestions here to help this article meet FAC. -- ॐ Kris (☎ talk | contribs) 19:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Article shows a fully partiality A4ay 07:32, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps you've got to read your own user talk page once in a while, or explain properly with examples as to what you mean by "partiality". Thanks & regards ­ ॐ Kris (☎ talk | contribs) 09:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA review

Informationally speaking, this has a lot of promise. There are a number of issues that need to be dealt with before this can be considered.

1. The references need to be cited better. See WP:CITE for pointers.

   Along with this, consider some non-web references. They may be hard to come by given the language gap, but his importance would probably suggest some possible better references.

2. It's very listy. Consider working the paragraph breaks for performances and appearances into a more prose-based standard. The way it breaks up is jarring when read.
3. Consider moving the recordings to their own separate pages. The article is detailed enough where it doesn't need to be here, plenty can be said to sustain individual articles, and that's the basic standard anyway.
4. Fair use images need rationales, and if you're planning to eventually bring this to FA, you may need some more detail regarding the GFDL licensing, but I'm not sure about that.

Good luck! --badlydrawnjeff talk 15:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

ALSO The article has some WP:NPOV problems as well. I'm afraid it comes across as hero worship of Chembai.--Ling.Nut 02:54, 16 December 2006 (UTC)