User talk:Charon9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Charon9, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few more good links for to help you get started:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  --Bhadani 14:38, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Protected edits?

Hiyas Charon9. I saw your edit on requests for page protection. Were you intending to ask for page protection on that article? The section you placed your request in is for asking an admin to do an edit to a protected page, but not to change the protection status of the article. --Syrthiss 15:44, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

can you direct me to the correct page then ? Sorry I'm a newb at having to ask this one
Thx Charon9 15:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Not a prob. I saw you expanded the description on that page, I'll just move it to the right section and format it. It was the correct page, just a weird section. ;)
I do have to say, that in my opinion as an admin... Protection will be likely denied unless the anon is very persistent. They've only vandalized that article once, and you were right on top of it reverting it. However, I'll still put it up on the page for you because its possible another admin will agree. --Syrthiss 15:59, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


Yeah I missclicked save instead of preview for my link /sigh -- Is a habit to start the paper trail early on those things - the ADL (and related types) hound us all the time.

Thanks for the prompt response Charon9
Please see Talk:Little Shell Band of Chippewa Indians. CJLippert 15:15, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed Deletions

I have proposed the three "Treaty of Old Crossing" articles for deletion; as they are, they are merely texts, which are (according to a comment on one of the talk pages) already on Wikisource. I think there should definitely be an article that covers these treaties, I just don't think having the full text in Wikipedia is desirable or encyclopedaic. You are, of course, free to remove my "prod" tags and discuss the matter on the articles' talk pages. --Brianyoumans 10:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

I wish I knew more about wiki-edits, to do a redirect to the wikisource articles / no problem with me on the removals but would like a redirect on them as a few pages resource them.Charon9 18:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America Newsletter - July '06

The Indigenous Peoples of North America Portal has been established, as a starting point for those wishing to learn more about the subject, with information and links on a wide variety of issues. It also contains news regarding the continent's various tribes and nations. It's a graphically pleasing site, and everyone is encouraged to check it out.
The project's home page has a new design, featuring tabbed subpages on participants, templates, articles, categories, and the to do list.
The Article Classification lists have been moved to their own subpage due to size. This is a sign of progress in the ongoing work of this project.
The project's talk page template has been updated, along with the classification system, to include the assessment on the talk pages of the articles that have been classified and assessed.
Balance
As the Project reaches its first six months of activity, the great effort all of you have invested in it has turned the vast information available on Indigenous North American topics from a deorganized cumulous into an excellent and easy to consult database. Although much work is still in order, few WikiProjects are able to obtain the amazing results we are proud to show today. To all of you, thank you and congratulations!
The assessment of articles within the scope of the project is still an ongoing process. We need people to help in this who are not contributors to the articles they are assessing. Also, there is the ongoing need for identifying and cataloguing articles that fall within the scope of this project. As of today, nearly 1,500 have been identified within the Project's scope.
Signed by
Aaron Walden & Phaedriel - 15:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC)