User talk:Charlesknight
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
user_talk:Charlesknight/archive 1 : all til 16/10/06
user_talk:Charlesknight/archive 2 : all til 01/12/06
[edit] Reference desk
This kind of opinion is irrelevant to the project, and potentially harmful. How would it look if the wrong person saw this and the media picked it up and ran a story about "Wikipedia calls Scientology an evil sick cult"? I think the we should refrain from offering personal opinion as a standard practice, but particularly when dealing with sensitive subjects, this kind of polemic is unhelpful. Friday (talk) 22:08, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- At any rate, I've removed your comment as needlessly inflammatory. Please don't make this kind of comment again. Friday (talk) 22:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Charles
My reference to Netquantum as 'Netqueerperson' may be immature, but it is NOT homophobic. Centuries before homosexuals hijacked the words gay and queer, the word queer referred to an 'unusual' person. That is my reference to Netquantum. He is an EXTREMELY queer person, as you will discover if you trace back all his contradictory and innane contributions on this subject. In particular, he has gone out of his way to have Enviga removed from Wiki, or if it remains turn it into an advertisement for an obscure competing product (as he sees it) from his home country of Switzerland. He made a whole lot of baloney claims that the Swiss product invented carbonated teas (not true), that the Swiss product had patents on their product (not true), that Nestles/Coke scientists STOLE the formula from the Swiss manufacturer(not true). These were ALL a figment of his imagination, and I spent days getting the evidence to prove he was wrong. The Swiss product uses green tea extracts from Bayer, just like most of the other green tea beverage suppliers. There is NOTHING exclusive about it, moreover, the formula is totally dissimilar to Enviga - so his insistence on incorporating, nay dominating the Enviga page (see his early contributions) with the Swiss product just made no sense at all. But like a bad smell, he kept coming back making ever-more ridiculous statements. Then he has the cheek to claim that what I wrote about Enviga was just an advertisement for them (which is patently ridiculous if you bother to read it) and more recently has argued that Enviga should not be in Wiki at all. You get the picture. He is either commercially involved with the Swiss product, or hates Coca Cola, or is a moron. Sorry to be so blunt, but there can not be any other explanation for his weird behaviour. Notwithstanding my clumsy attempt to contribute on this subject, my intentions all along have been to educate the reader. Netquantum has the opposite intention, ie, to censor and hijack information, misrepresent the truth, and promote a competing product to Enviga by piggybacking of the Enviga page. He should have set up a separate page for the Swiss product and blabbed on forever about it, but has constantly refused to do so. This says a lot about his true intentions.
Pete
[edit] Grosvenor PFC
I see you had nominated Grosvenor PFC for deletion under the AfD process. After your nomination, the AfD template had been removed numerous times, being replaced each time by MER-C. However, the template ended up being removed and was missing for most of the discussion period. I have relisted the discussion under the December 9 AfD log. You may want to watch articles you nominate so as to ensure that these kinds of acts of vandalism do not go unnoticed. Agent 86 00:53, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
