Talk:Charlotte, Princess Royal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ] | |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 10:12, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Move
As she was a Queen Consort, shouldn't it be Charlotte, Princess Royal or Charlotte of Great Britain, Princess Royal to follow the NC, Victoria, Princess Royal and Empress Frederick is a perfect example. Prsgoddess187 16:32, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- Support as nominator of page move. Prsgoddess187 16:32, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Wiki naming conventions for royals and nobility get to be insane: I'm all for paring down and simplifying, particularly when the conventions themselves call for it. QuartierLatin1968
18:35, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] The picture is wrong
The picture of the article shows Charlotte, Princess of Wales, niece of Princess Royal Charlotte!
[edit] The new picture.
Indeed, it was the wrong picture.
Excuse my presumption, but since I had the book, a scanner, and a little time? I edited in one that is, most definitely, of Charlotte, Princess Royal. (Painted before her marriage).
I could use some advice on the copyright issues and how it's done through Wiki. But this scan, which I took from Flora Fraser's book on the daughters of George III. In the details of the image, I included the name of the artist, in what collection the picture is located, correct title, blah blah.
But yes!
I'm satisfied. :-) I have others from when she was married, but this one shows her in her status as Princess Royal, so I think it suits. She looks a lot like her father in this picture.
