User talk:Catherine breillat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello Catherine breillat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Bobet 00:02, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Template:Good article
You wrote in the templates for deletion log:
Please consider any votes from the listed users especially carefully when tallying, and may i advise all parties involved, on both sides, to continue this debate in a "civil" manner. Using the word "strong" has no particular influence here. Thankyou.
Are you suggesting that my vote should not be considered? User RJN may have entered this on my talk page, but the vote belongs to me. Thanks Postoak 00:58, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Karen Dotrice
According to the discussions currently at Talk:Lindsay Lohan and Wikipedia talk:Good articles, there is no current policy on list orders. A quick look of the search-returned relevant pages (Wikipedia:Filmographies and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lists of works)) shows them to be archived and inactive—as in, not implemented. Why do you insist on reverting to a style guide that doesn't exist? Please restore my last edit so that I'm not revert-warring, or I'll ask an admin to step in instead. RadioKirk talk to me 18:53, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I still dont understand? All featured articles have had their discographies, bibliographies, and filmographies in the same order since time immemorial. The fact there is no official policy on the matter doesnt undo the fact that the *practice* on wikipedia has always been the same. Now from what I gather the last few standout back-to-front articles (a handful including Karen Dotrice) have been corrected to conform with all the rest. What makes Karen Dotrice so special that her article should be the only one in the entire featured articles set that is different? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Catherine breillat (talk • contribs).
-
- No, clearly, I'm the one who doesn't understand. You have to be right, even though there is no official policy, because everything else is that way—never mind the fact that both Karen Dotrice and Lindsay Lohan were voted featured articles with nary a mention of the chronology. (Oh, and I like how "every" other article is that way only after you changed Keira Knightley, Uma Thurman, KaDee Strickland and Katie Holmes, referencing the nonexistent style guide.) I'm just going to leave you alone, now, because I have an encyclopedia to help write. RadioKirk talk to me 19:29, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] HKCOTW
 |
|
|
|
Please help improve it to featured article standard.
Every week, a Hong Kong-related topic, stub or nonexistent article is picked to be the HK Collaboration of the Week. The previous HKCOTW was KCR - see improvements.
|
||
