Talk:Casey Atwood

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

It is requested that a photograph or photographs of this person be included in this article to improve its quality.

	This article is part of WikiProject NASCAR, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to NASCAR. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, you can visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. To view recent changes to the project's articles, please check out the related changes page.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Controversy

Unless anyone objects, I am going to remove the "Controversy" section from this article. It's way too POV. --D-Day ^{I'm all ears How can I improve?} 14:09, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

I'll remain neutral on this. Casey14 18:34, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

It seems to me the controversy is needed for this to be a useful article. As written, it tends to be rather nitpicky; perhaps it could be more of a summary of the two points of view. —EncMstr 20:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

I think Controversy should be removed. It has no place in an encyclopedia article. It reads to me to be only fan-talk of no real relevance or importance. Almost all of the drivers in all of Nascar history would have performed better had they been given better equipment or more chances. It is a part of the sport. What happens happens. If Casey acctually were as good as this section of the article implys I'm sure at least one Nascar owner would have noticed. Besides the article as a whole gives him the due credit for his accomplishments.Andrew Grigg 01:08, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

I vote to remove the controversy section, per Andrew Grigg's argument. Way too POV, and sounds like a fan's excuse. --Royalbroil 04:30, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Maybe the section could be rewritten or something similar. There is some good information in the section. Casey14 19:53, 9 August 2006 (UTC)