User talk:CartoonDiablo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Bedn.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Bedn.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bradcis 16:17, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, CartoonDiablo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question. Again, welcome!
Runcorn 21:31, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Newgrounds BBS

You re-created the entry on the NG BBS, not withstanding that it was previously deleted with a strong concensus. Don't break Wikipedia rules again or you might get banned. Mackan 08:56, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

The recreated article has now been speedy deleted. Please understand that the Wikipedia community has agreed that the Newsgrounds BBS is not notable enough to warrant an article. Please do not continue to recreate this article. Thanks, Gwernol 10:40, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Newgrounds

I too, am a fan of Newgrounds [1], and I understand your enthusaism about the site. However, it is important for articles to be concise and focused--articles should describe the subject and major components of the subject as concisely as possible. Moreover, adding terms and important users is considered orginal research, even more so without external documentation. View Adam Fulton or Jeff Weise for an example of how important users should be documented.

It is important, just as it is at Newgrounds, to read the rules and regulations here at Wikipedia.--HowardSF 06:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Could you please stop adding information about the NG BBS. It's of no value to the article. 217.209.197.17 15:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Newgrounds

I've been monitering Newgrounds for some time, and there seems to be some controversy regarding the inclusion of the BBS in the article. Now I know that you personally think that information in the BBS belongs in the article and that many editors agree with you, I also know though that many editors believe that there should be no mention of the BBS as is evident by their requests to delete all mention of it in the AFD for the article on the Newgrounds BBS.

Now I'm not saying that either side is right or wrong, but I feel the back and forth editing on the article needs to come to an end. I'd wonder if you and some of the editors who want it left out of the article would be willing to discuss a solution that at least gives everyone a little bit of what they want. I've left a similar message on the talk page of one of them and would appreciate if we could all sort this out before it possibly gets edit-warry. Cheers Canadian-Bacon (contribs) 03:28, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Josh_Bend_interview.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Josh_Bend_interview.ogg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:28, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Newgrounds BBS Recreation

You have recently created the article Newgrounds BBS. This was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article: if you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a review at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Hagerman(talk) 02:21, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Weapons in Halo

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Weapons in Halo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Weapons in Halo. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Antidrugue 04:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../c/a/r/User_talk%7ECartoonDiablo_4c6f.html"