User talk:Carre
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Carre, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Lcarsdata (Talk) 12:35, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Bedfordshire infobox table
Thank you for joining the WikiProject and I would like to give you a warm welcome.
Also you put the infobox table into alphabetical order, although this may seem correct, we ideally want the table to be in order of infobox status and then alphabetical order so a work list is created that we can go up in order of articles in need of most attention. Lcarsdata (Talk) 12:36, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Rugby World Cup
Hi Carre, I saw your message on the talk page, please feel free to make any changes, especially the spelling/grammar errors that you found. Don't hesitate in making changes to improve the article. Cheers. Cvene64 04:04, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] No personal attacks
While I'm aware you are doing a good job reverting vandalism, please try and remain civil and avoid personal attacks such as you made in this edit summary. Cheers --Pak21 17:56, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
- Well, since an IP address isn't a person, it's not a personal attack... but since the arsehole using that IP address is a person, that does come under personal... :) Seriously, I get the point, and thought much the same to myself just after I hit save. Oh well.
[edit] Help me! Deleting pages
Just going through the recent changes, and came across this page, that seems a vanity page and a subject of vandalism to boot. Was just wondering how the hell you delete, or nominate for deletion.
Ta.
- I haven't looked at the page myself (shall do so in a second) but if it is a vanity page then you can flag it for speedy deletion as such by adding the tag {{db-bio}}. For other categories for speedy deletion, see Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion. If you're not certain that it falls under a speedy deletion category, see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion. Angus Lepper 14:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yep, looks like a candidate for speedy deletion with {{db-bio}}. Good catch. Angus Lepper 14:30, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Cheers for the prompt reply :) Carre 14:33, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- No problem :-) Angus Lepper 15:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Cheers for the prompt reply :) Carre 14:33, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yep, looks like a candidate for speedy deletion with {{db-bio}}. Good catch. Angus Lepper 14:30, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Rachel Parish image deletion
Thank you very much for letting me know. I already contacted Miss Parish for further detail on the ownership and copyright of the image, and will clarify when I have this. If the image gets deleted in the meantime, this is in accordance with Wikipedia policy and I will certainly not complain. If I get the appropriate formal acknowledement of permission, I will either update the tags on the image, or (if it has already been deleted) re-upload the photograph. Thanks, Stelio 11:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Rating and reheading for The Antipope
A response, to your comments. I was attempting to bring the headings in line with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/ArticleTemplate guideline. So some of the nature of the headings might not work completely. Perhaps your could bear this pattern template in mind when writing.
On subject of the major themes - it probably means you have sunject matter for a seperate "styles" section (perhaps placed after the "Major themes" one as well.
Also if you have information to populate a more comprehensive ==Literary significance & criticism== that would be good as the more balanced treatment of issues that directly relate to notability are often overlooked. "Sales figures", "reviews", "criticisms" and "appreciations" could all be included. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 15:55, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ernest Hemingway
Hi, in this edit you reverted to the version in which I had added a request for citation{{fact}} , but removed the request for citation. Was this intentional? If so can you add you reasoning to Talk:Ernest_Hemingway#Inconsistency_in_Text. GameKeeper 22:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC)