From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request.
Request reason: "I am not a "sockpuppet master" and I do not know why you think I am. Just because some other user decided to edit a page I created and you deleted does not mean I am that user. I understand if you do not think my citations for the Nutt article were thorough enough, but I do not think a ban of my account is called for."
Decline reason: "See Wknight94's comments below."
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
- TexasPete (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) voted keep on the AFD for your Nutt article in his 4th edit.
- You left this message on his talk page. What article of yours did he supposedly deface?
- 68.69.203.11 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • block user • block log):
- Made this edit involving your Nutt article.
- Made edits to your now-deleted Nutt article.
- Is now putting messages on TexasPete's user and user talk page saying we're all assholes.
You're all socks. Strongly recommend that someone impartial declines the unblock. —Wknight94 (talk) 13:08, 7 October 2006 (UTC) I think wknight94 might be a sock puppet, i found this on his website: http://www.withoutray.com/special_photos/jason_sock.jpg - —texaspete (talk) 4:20, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
