From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiDefcon |
WikiDefcon 5: Very low levels of vandalism.
|
[[edit]] |
Just another quiet weekend. MER-C 10:39, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
|
A Wikipedia Call to Arms from Brad Patrick
"I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
"Definitions Articles will greet us as liberators"
This user has been awarded the
Anonymous Wikipedia Parrot by the British online tabloid
The Inquirer,
July 14 2006. Additional mention: "Wikiparrots are really geniuses" - hidden sidebar comment, The Inquirer, July 16 2006
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Edit count for Bwithh
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
[edit] Articles created
[edit] Favourite Wikipedia AfD moment
- When a bystander inclusionist called me a "powermad asshole" who launches deletionist "Wikijihads" against innocent articles during the WWAC-TV hoax investigation - which concluded with total surrender, full confession, and abject apology by the panicked hoaxers.
- Nice job researching this one. - ScottW 21:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Defender of the Wiki Barnstar 1
-
- I, User:Pete.Hurd, award you this Defender of the Wiki barnstar for your investigations into the Brent Henry Waddington hoax
[edit] Barnstar of Diligence
|
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
For your diligent research efforts to establish actual WP:V for subjects on WP:AfD, rather than lazy leafing through notability guidelines. ~ trialsanderrors 20:08, 2 July 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] Defender of the Wiki Barnstar 2
- Barnstar with bar (as in I came here to give you a barnstar for your work on this AFD & William Pietri beat me to it). Rock on! Pete.Hurd 04:16, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- Holy cow! You're the same guy that did the amazing digging on the Alakon/Brent Henry Waddington hoax investigation! My hat's off to you!! Pete.Hurd 04:23, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Other significant contributions
[edit] Articles I am only not nominating for deletion out of personal sentimentality
[edit] Articles on people I have stood next to and engaged in small-talk for a minute or two, during which time I could have tried to ask something deep and meaningful, but I did not as my mind was totally blank
[edit] Would like to see...
- Much lower bar on deletion process (current requirement for consensus for deletion is a huge bias in favour of many non-notable articles). Wikipedia is not infinite in time or space or meaning.
- More established recognition of non-notability deletion criteria
- Fewer trivial pop culture references from pop culture media which are specifically designed to make numerous pop cultural references (XXX appeared in an episode of The Simpsons etc.)
- A solution to the over-wikification of dates problem
- Separate wikis for all fancruft
- Stricter guidelines to exclude "facts" created by marketing / publicity campaigns