Talk:Bungie.net

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This definitely seems biased. There is a paragraph about how one group is the "#1". I think this article needs to be merged with bungie as well and cleaned up.

--Monroylobo

Maybe it's just me, but some of the descriptions of the forums seem fairly biased. Some seem a little like cheap shots towards certain forums' members.

egotistical "pros" of Halo 2, who prefer the Battle Rifle (an overused, cheap weapon in Halo 2 equipped with a scope and a three round burst of bullets. Only four bursts to the head can kill you) over all weapons. Unfortunatley for them, that is the only weapon that they know how to really use. They have almost no knowledge at all about the other weapons in the game.

Doesn't seem neutral Rohawn 17:27, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

I'll fix it up... I've been around the forums for a while. From the sounds of it, he came to Bungie.net for the stats and ended up going to the forums purely for Halo 2, hence the spartan descriptions of the other ones. I'll expand on the others from what I know and change it to a less-biased description as well.

Helwer7

[edit] Updated Forum listing to current.

I have removed the Zanzibar section, as it no longer exists, and replaced it with the Halo 3 Forum information, as well as updated the subject matter for the New Mombasa forum. GameJunkieJim 18:50, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] No Advertising

MBT, you're not wanted. Don't advertise your group on here. That goes for the rest of you.

Helwer7 21:14, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

I've removed a link to their group in the Links section too. If it becomes any bigger of a problem on Bungie.net, I'm going to suggest that Achronos disband the group, since they can't seem to behave. GameJunkieJim 01:10, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Would someone please get rid of that thing on this page? I can't seem to find it in the code--24.17.111.225 04:44, 11 December 2006 (UTC)