Talk:BugMeNot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] good article

The article is good but its needs to be completed, actually is some ethics controversy about bugmenot use It would be good you can make reference to it in this article.

[edit] Down

Well, the site's down now.—thegreentrilby 20:00, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Well, the site's back up. --Shaddack 17:49, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
Well, I'm very happy it's back!—thegreentrilby 02:18, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
It's down again, its a godaddy now
Try nagfree, a wikified version. 128.3.63.67 23:31, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Use it!

Someone should put an entry on the BugMeNot site for Wikipedia, so that people that don't want to create a user name can use names that other people have registered. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.190.51.99 (talkcontribs) .

Shared accounts are not allowed on Wikipedia and are blocked on sight. Bugmenot does not provide any shared logins for Wikipedia. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 01:06, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
And besides, Wikipedia doesn't require any personal info, not even an e-mail address. --Happynoodleboy 11:49, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Bugmenot does not provide any shared logins for Wikipedia. They should. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.190.51.99 (talkcontribs) .
It would take as much time to look up a login for Wikipedia on BugMeNot as it would to create an account yourself. As I've said, no personal info and no e-mail address is required (e-mail addy is entirely optional). There would be NO benefit if BugMeNot provided logins for Wikipedia, which they do not and never will. --Happynoodleboy 17:03, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Also, BugMeNot blocked using its service for WP. The end. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 | T | C | @ 22:29, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
The truth is that people tends to abuse of that service, sharing accounts from paid services, people stealing shared accounts, and even sharing accounts for unregistered forums.Atenea26 19:40, 15 May 2006 (UTC)