Talk:Brympton d'Evercy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Brympton d'Evercy is a former good article candidate. There are suggestions below for which areas need improvement to satisfy the good article criteria. Once the objections are addressed, the article can be renominated as a good article. If you disagree with the objections, you can seek a review. Date of review: No date specified. Please edit template call function as follows: {{FailedGA|insert date in any format here}}

The page failed the above nomination with the following edit summary [1] This is not the case as is easily verified the page is fully referenced. Giano | talk 19:42, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

third of it has no footnotes and is thus unsourced - what a joke! GAs are not meant to be as fully worked up as FAs! Honestly, what is the point? -- ALoan (Talk) 21:16, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Voting down Good Articles has the valuable effect of keeping editors busy who might otherwise be crayoning on the walls. --Wetman 00:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

• This editor does not crayon on the walls, he climbs up them. Giano | talk 08:36, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

(I think he may be talking about the person who rejected it, rather than the one who nominated it... -- ALoan (Talk) 10:21, 9 March 2006 (UTC))

Do not insult my English ALoan, my meaning is perfectly clear - why are you writing in those mean letters? Giano | talk 10:28, 9 March 2006 (UTC)