User talk:Brian02139
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please stop vandalising the Stubhub page and my user page. Ben-w 21:45, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- If you feel that your version is more correct, you could explain why you think so, and support evidence for your claims. Your refusal to do so, just blindly reverting to your version every time, in addition to your repeated, malicious vandalism of my User page, speaks volumes. Ben-w 23:45, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
-
- Your behaviour is not very constructive. Ben-w 23:52, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
3RR
Brian, you've been reported for a 3RR violation at Stubhub. As you haven't been explicitly warned about this, I'm leaving this warning to say that if you revert again, you'll be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Three revert rule for more details. Also, in addition to the 3RR rule, your edits could be interpreted as vandalism, as they're not appropriate for the encyclopedia. Try to work out any disagreements you have on the article talk page at Talk:Stubhub. Many thanks, SlimVirgin (talk) 00:32, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- Also, just to clarify the above, I mean that if you revert or add any similar edits, you'll be blocked from editing, as the edits are arguably vandalism, if not by intent then in effect. I advise you not to edit that page again until you've read our content policies. You can see them at WP:NPOV, WP:V, and WP:NOR. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 00:55, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Block
You've been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism, disruption, 3RR, and sockpuppetry. You're welcome to return after the block ends if you want to make constructive edits, but if this happens again, the next block will be indefinite. SlimVirgin (talk) 01:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
{{unblock}} Slimvirgin, I think you need to see how many edits Ben-w has made to the page. He is the one who should have a 3rr or a block not me.
I am not saying anyting negative about the company.
I am not lying. None of what I said is original research.
I think you need to look at Ben-w motivations before you crticize me.
{{unblock}}
- The block on your account expired several hours before you posted this, so unless you are caught up in another block (or autoblock for trying to evade the first block) then you aren't blocked. If you are caught up in another block we can't do anything without the detail of that block which appear in the block message. --pgk(talk) 17:22, 21 April 2006 (UTC)</nowiki>
Brian02139 23:52, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Stubhub
You have made an edit that could be regarded as defamatory. Please do not restore this material to the article or its talk page. If you do, you may be blocked for disruption. See the blocking policy. SlimVirgin (talk) 03:04, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
SlimVirgin, Please take the time to read the following story.
Thanks, Brian02139
-
- That is not evidence in support of any of your claims. It is an interview with someone who works in the marketing dept for the company. Ben-w 16:09, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Block
Brian, I've blocked this account indefinitely as I see you re-added the material shortly after being warned not to. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:00, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
{{unblock}}
The article specifically says former employees of Ebay working for Stubhub.
- Your edits to the article say much more than that, those claims are not backed up in any way shape or form by the article you post above. You've been more than adequately warned, the time to try and resolve the issue was before repeatedly reposting the same information. We don't do edit warring here as you full well know. No unblock --pgk(talk) 10:39, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
PGK, There is only one claim which is backed up by the article. Please read it. Evidence: http://www.adotas.com/2006/04/adtech-conversations-dre-madden-marketing-manager-strategy-new-development-stubhubcom/
Thanks, Brian02139
