Talk:Bristol

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bristol is either included in the 2006 Wikipedia CD Selection or is a candidate for inclusion in the next version (the project page is at WPCD Selection). Please maintain high quality standards, and if possible stick to GFDL and GFDL-compatible images.

Bristol has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Bristol has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.

This article has been selected for Version 0.5 and the next release version of Wikipedia. This Geography article has been rated GA-Class on the assessment scale.

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to places in the UK. If you wish to contribute you can visit the project page where there are resources & guidelines, to do lists and discussions.	United Kingdom Portal
This article has been rated "A" on the Wikipedia Version 1.0 quality scale.
On the project page you can find detailed guides on how to write about counties and settlements, as well as where to find statistics, references and other useful things. Additionally, the following has been identified as specific improvements this article needs: Add statistics to economy and industry section, such as GDP and employment figures, how many people commute from outside the city, how much different sectors contribute to the economy and how many tourists come to visit & the attractions that draw them in. These pages may help: [1] [2] [3] and Chapter 14 of [4]. The data should be easy to obtain, I just can't open PDF files on this computer. Physical geography section including geology, landscape, ecology and climate with possible sub-page Geology of Bristol. Possibly rename Arts and leasure to culture, and split to Culture of Bristol summary style. Are there any more interesting demographics info? The raw census data is here, and somebody may already have made graphs etc that are easier to read. I've started analysing age structure, but it's tedious working from the raw data with only google cache to read it in. Transport statistics. We already mention the roads and claim that a lot of people cycle. Something could also be said about the busses, and their discontents. And statistics would be good to illustrate them. I looked through the city council website but couldn't find any. Turn people section into prose? After turning the people section into prose and moving the paragraphs to more relevant sections (and deleting a few "so and so lived in Bristol for a few months many years ago" items that weren't notable) I was left with the following which I was unsure what to do with: Keith Floyd, TV chef, ran several restaurants in Bristol, and got his start in TV at BBC Bristol. <-- Possibly culture, but I don't even know if he's notable enough, being in the Bristol people category might be enough. John Harvey founded the Bristol wine merchants John Harvey & Sons, and their sherry brand Harvey's Bristol Cream has taken the name of Bristol all over the world. <-- Possible culture: most cities/counties mention food and drink in culture. James May, BBC Top Gear presenter and Daily Telegraph columnist was born in Bristol <-- No idea who this is, is he notable enough to be mentioned in the article? Populate Category:Natives of Bristol Add to the Bristol images gallery and commons:Bristol.

Contents 1 Aeronautical history 2 Size in Middle Ages 3 Geography 4 Areas 5 Cabot Tower and other images 6 Transport 7 Bristol collaboration / featured article attempt 8 Panorama 9 Daniel Li? 10 Drugs problems 11 Duplicate history article 12 John Farey??? 13 Industrial museum - free? 14 Area/population 15 Propose splitting industry 16 Bristol "L" 17 Places of interest 18 Citations 19 WikiProject 20 Proposed Merger 21 Proposal: photo contests 22 FAC 23 Population growth in the 19th century 24 The Riots? 25 Rhyming slang. 26 Suspension bridge image 27 Bristol - city 28 Where to place this sentence

[edit] Aeronautical history

Does the article need more on Concorde and Filton? The runway extension (for the Brabazon I think)? Nevilley 08:05 Feb 27, 2003 (UTC)

Arpingstone seems to be our resident expert on Filton. Obviously I wouldn't presume to speak for him, but you could drop a note on his talk in case he's not watching this page. --rbrwr (who is within sight of the Filton runway at the moment).

I have wroted to him. Watch this space. :) Nevilley

PS I had a friend in Thornbury. He was an ex-policeman and had been on duty at Filton the day the first Concorde flight from there took off. He said it was quite spectacular when the fence got blown down by the engines! Nevilley

Ok, I'll see what I can find. Very nice article on Bristol, I'm impressed! -- Arpingstone 19:23 Feb 27, 2003 (UTC)

Done!! -- Arpingstone 20:55 Feb 28, 2003 (UTC)

Cheers! --rbrwr

---

Just a tiny bit more clarification sought:

1. The "BAC" in the bit about Concorde is the same thing as the "Bristol Aeroplane Company" mentioned lower down - is that right?
2. Do I remember right about the massive runway extension being for the Brabazon? Or did I make that up? What [I think] I'm on about is the effect you can see here where the extension clearly zaps the road and (istr) a village or hamlet or something was lost - is that right? Anyone help?? :) Nevilley 11:24 Mar 1, 2003 (UTC)

OK, I'll try to find out the answer to your questions and add the answers to the Bristol article -- Arpingstone 12:27 Mar 1, 2003 (UTC)

The village was called Charlton, and is mentioned here and here --rbrwr

What BAC means depends on the time you're talking about. In the earlier years it was Bristol Aeroplane Company and later, by strange chance, it was British Aircraft Corporation. So when BAC is used in an article which one is meant should be put somewhere.

When I've time I'll add about the loss of Charlton to the Bristol article. -- Arpingstone 09:02 Mar 2, 2003 (UTC)

The date by the picture of concorde is wrong, but i cant see where to edit it. It should read 1969 can someone change this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.73.220.209 (talk • contribs) --rbrwr^±.

The caption is correct: Concorde 216 (the aircraft in question) did first fly in 1979 [5]. You're thinking of the prototype 002, which was the first British Concorde flight, and was in 1969. The first flight of any Concorde, also in 1969, was from Toulouse. --rbrwr^± 09:03, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Size in Middle Ages

Highly questionable whether Bristol was third largest City in Middle Ages, Norwich is invariably credited as being England's second City until circa 1700 THEN when Sea-trade shifted from the Continent to North Atlantic Bristol rose in stature. Norwikian 11:12, 5 Nov 2003 (UTC)

According to Peter Aughton, Bristol: A People's History (2000), the 1377 poll tax returns (persons over 14 years) were: London 23314, York 7248, Bristol 6345, Coventry 4817, Norwich 3952, Lincoln 3412. Bristol did not join in the Peasants' Revolt against the poll tax in 1381, so maybe there was under-reporting in the other towns and cities but not in Bristol. Nevertheless, that seems to be the source of the claim. --rbrwrˆ 15:55, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Geography

I diagree that rainfall in Bristol is "similar to the national average". The previous two sentences refer to "cities" rather than national average, and so should the third. Huge swathes of the UK are scotland and welsh hills, so the "national average" for rainfall is very much wetter than most urban areas. Bristol is one of the wettest urban areas in England...but I cant find a reference right now!... Also, under prevailing W/SW winds Bristol is only sheltered by the very edge of the Mendips - hence the rain Fig 23:02, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Areas

Request for opinions: I propose areas and towns be changed to give: "Wards" instead of areas, and "towns". Also, the current article is somewhat inaccurate - Catbrain is not in Bristol, but in South Gloucestershire. Such errors would also be corrected. Nick04 18:54, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Feel free. I note that the 'areas and towns' section also lists Filton. I think it is in fact listing places in the Bristol conurbation, not just the places in the legal city of Bristol. Morwen - Talk 18:57, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Well, a list of wards would be just that - wards. They don't necessarily correspond to the areas that people talk about in real life. "Cabot", for example, is a completely synthetic ward; there's not much that can be said about it as a community. On the other hand "real" places like Shirehampton and St Paul's would be off the list. --rbrwrˆ 20:22, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)

OK - How about putting a list of wards under the "Local Government" heading, matching up each ward with its two councillors, and removing the errors from Areas and Towns (being Catbrain, Filton, and Patchway - all of which are in South Gloucestershire), as well as expanding the section to include other areas (Broadmead, Montpelier etc). Thus, wards are associated with government, and areas and towns are separate. Nick04 09:58, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)

That sounds promising. Another source of "areas and towns" that occurred to me would be the areas which are identified on well-known maps of Bristol (the A-Z and the OS 1:50k spring to mind). As the article as a whole deals with some things that are outside the city limits but belong to Bristol from a global perspective (i.e. BAC/Concorde at Filton) we should probably have a (separate) list of adjoining suburbs and towns alongside it. Does that sound like a good idea? --rbrwrˆ 10:44, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Two lists of Bristol placenames:

Hotwells -- Clifton -- Sneyd Park -- Stoke Bishop -- Sea Mills -- Shirehampton -- Avonmouth -- Lawrence Weston -- Blaise Hamlet -- Henbury -- Combe Dingle -- Westbury on Trym -- Brentry -- Southmead -- Eastfield -- Henleaze -- Golden Hill -- Westbury Park -- Redland -- Cotham -- Bishopston -- Horfield -- Lockleaze -- Ashley Down -- Montpelier -- Eastville -- Stapleton -- Ridgeway -- Broomhill -- Fishponds -- Hillfields -- Clay Hill -- Speedwell -- Two Mile Hill -- Whitehall -- Easton -- Barton Hill -- Netham -- St George -- St Anne's Park -- Broom Hill -- Brislington -- Arno's Vale -- Knowle -- Hengrove -- Filwood Park -- Hartcliffe -- Windmill Hill -- Lower Knowle -- Novers Park -- Headley Park -- Bishopsworth -- Highridge -- Bedminster Down -- Ashton Vale -- Bower Ashton -- Ashton Gate -- Bedminster --

Clifton -- Sea Mills -- Shirehampton -- Avonmouth -- Lawrence Weston -- Coombe Dingle -- Henbury -- Westbury on Trym -- Stapleton -- Fishponds -- Brislington -- Knowle -- Bedminster (...plus...) Canon's Marsh -- Hotwells -- Clifton Wood -- Victoia Park -- Sneyd Park -- Stoke Bishop -- Blaise Hamlet -- Botany Bay -- Brentry -- Southmead -- Eastfield -- Henleaze -- Golden Hill -- Westbury Park -- Redland -- Cotham -- Kingsdown -- Bishopston -- Horfield -- Lockleaze -- Ashley Down -- St Andrews -- Montpelier -- Baptist Mills -- St Paul's -- Broadmead -- Eastville -- Upper Eastville -- Ridgeway -- Broomhill -- Hillfields -- Mayfield Park -- Chester Park -- Clay Hill -- Rose Green -- Crofts End -- Speedwell -- Two Mile Hill -- Burchells Green -- Whiteway -- Whitehall -- Redfield -- Moorfields -- Upper Easton -- Russell Town -- Newtown -- Barton Hill -- The Dings -- St Philip's Marsh -- Netham -- Pile Marsh -- St George -- Crew's Holes -- White's Hill -- Conham -- St Anne's Park -- St Anne's -- Broom Hill -- Kensington Hill -- Kensington Park -- Arno's Vale -- Totterdown -- Upper Knowle -- Stockwood -- Hengrove -- Knowle Park -- Filwood Park -- Inn's Court -- Hartcliffe -- Windmill Hill -- Lower Knowle -- Headley Park -- Bishopsworth -- Withywood -- Highridge -- Bedminster Down -- Ashton Vale -- Bower Ashton -- Ashton Gate

and these are the Council wards:

Ashley -- Avonmouth -- Bedminster -- Bishopston -- Bishopsworth -- Brislington East/West -- Cabot -- Clifton/Clifton East -- Cotham -- Easton -- Eastville -- Filwood -- Frome Vale -- Hartcliffe -- Henbury -- Hengrove -- Henleaze -- Hillfields -- Horfield -- Kingsweston -- Knowle -- Lawrence Hill -- Lockleaze -- Redland -- Southmead -- Southville -- St. George East/West -- Stockwood -- Stoke Bishop -- Westbury-on-Trym -- Whitchurch Park -- Windmill Hill

Any ideas? --rbrwrˆ 21:01, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Wards - How about a layout such as this:

• Ashely - Councillors: Shirley Marshall (Liberal Democrat), Dudley Paul Saward (Labour Party)

I guess it would be easiest to get the wards done, and then try and get a area list together. Any suggestions for ward layout? Nick04 17:42, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Looks OK to me, except that the links should be to Liberal Democrat and Labour Party. --rbrwrˆ 21:33, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Cabot - I used to live in Cabot ward in the early 80s and also viewed it as illogical (though not synthetic) - but older hands pointed out that it was the old 'Docks' ward, and up until the 50s/60s rundown of the City Docks would indeed have had a character and cohenrence all of its own.Linuxlad 17:16, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

A place called "Chesterfield Park" has found its way into the list of "Areas and Towns". I can't find any evidence of its existence, though there is a "Chester Park" on the A-Z map, between Fishponds and Kingswood, just inside the city boundary. Can anybody confirm or deny the existence of Chesterfield Park in Bristol? --rbrwr^± 14:03, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cabot Tower and other images

Maybe we should add this photo

Edward 13:36, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Go right ahead if you want. It's an old one of mine from a great nostalgia pilgrimage to Bristol a year or two ago. It's a pity the tower is so small but it was hacked out from a MUCH larger 35mm pic. Pending anything better of the CT it's not bad. One day perhaps we can get a better one... I think I had trouble getting a good angle on it, was somewhere down near the Central Library or somewhere istr and there was buildings in the way everywhere so this was probably between two pubs and a telegraph pole or something ... :) --Nevilley 14:35, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I will get a better one, hopefully within the next two weeks. But it's not as if the article is short of pictures at the moment. I say leave it out. ---rbrwrˆ

I went on a long walk yesterday photographing various parts of Clifton and Bristol for Wikipedia purposes. They're at Fujilab just now (I'm so old-fashioned) but hopefully I should have a much better shot of the Cabot Tower among other things uploaded within a few days. --rbrwrˆ 19:38, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)

I have various photos of the like on my site (Cabot Tower, Brandon Hill) that are GFDLd. --Steinsky 18:56, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)

As promised, a new picture of the tower, now in use on John Cabot. Unfortunately I didn't get a good shot of the Cabot statue outside the Arnolfini - he was in the shade of the trees and came out too dark. Various other Bristol-related articles have new illustrations, too. --rbrwrˆ 17:21, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)

These are excellent! --138.37.188.109 10:37, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Transport

Is the portishead railway open all the way? I've noticed the line in use as far as portbury dock, but along the NCN's C33 from Pill to Portishead the railway appears to be totally overgrown still. --Steinsky 15:04, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)

I think you may be right. As it's for freight only at the moment, it only needs to go as far as the docks at Portbury, not into Portishead station. --rbrwrˆ 15:27, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Bristol collaboration / featured article attempt

If anybody else is interested, we're currently discussing a collaboration on a local article, probably Bristol Harbour, with the possibility of submitting as consideration for featured article. The discussion is at Talk:Bristol Harbour. --Joe D 23:28, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Panorama

I contributed a vertically stretched panorama initially. This was deliberate. In my opinion a streched panorama is easier to view on a web browser than an undistorted version that ends up looking like a very long and thin bar. Vertical streching does not really make a picture of buildings look that much worse. It looks a bit like photo taken with a wide angle lens. What is your opinion? Klafubra 11:15, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Klafubra, I'm very surprised you would find a highly distorted pic acceptable on WP and it certainly isn't the effect a wide-angle lens gives. There's nothing wrong with a long thin bar on the page because it's only a thumbnail and the reader (if interested) will immediately enlarge it. Thank you for leaving my corrected pic in the article. In any case, de-stretching it in Photoshop took me only about ten minutes including pulling it off WP , correcting it with EDIT TRANSFORM SCALE and then reuploading it. (PS New contributions to Talk go at the bottom of the page so I've moved yours to here) Best Wishes,Adrian Pingstone 12:44, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

IMO, the unstretched version is far nicer. Joe D (t) 23:23, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Daniel Li?

Google searches: "daniel li" dj bristol; "underground clownstep". I am suspicious. --rbrwr^± 23:29, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I think there may be grounds to be more than just suspicious! --Joe D (t) 06:38, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Drugs problems

While the material was POV and clearly didn't belong in the introductory section, I was aware that Bristol's drug problem was notable before I lived there or had any intrest in the city, so it's probabaly notable enough for a one or two sentence mention somewhere in the page. --Joe D (t) 06:38, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate history article

Just out of interest why is there a History of Bristol article which has exactly the same content as the history section on the main page?. Was someone planning to expand it or something, or is it just an unnecesary duplication. G-Man 19:22, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)

The history section on the main page was very long so I moved it to a sub-page, we just haven't got 'round to reducing it to a more concise summary yet though (same goes for most of the other UK counties pages). I think the history page has already been expanded a little. --Joe D (t) 20:24, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] John Farey???

I think perhaps a hoax may have slipped by us all - under "famous people":

• "John Farey is one of the most reknowned travellers, famous in Bristol. In the past, he has voyaged to Antarctica, and has attempted the discovery of ancient Atlantis. In his spare time he also fought in the Cuban Revolutionary War. He is now retired living in Bishopston, Bristol. Enjoying a life writing children's fiction, and has already had 3 books published."

I've removed the entry. Nick04 22:29, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Industrial museum - free?

I notice that the Industrial Museum has a little red museum icon, implying it is not free. Is this a recent change?. I'm pretty sure it was free when I visited last year. -- Chris j wood 00:05, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I visited it in early August last year, and although I'm not certain, I don't think I paid for it. The webpage about it on the Bristol City website [6] doesn't mention anything about an entrance cost, but the generic musuems page states "There is free entry to the six museums and historic sites spread across the city of Bristol." [7]

AboutBritain.com [8], 24hourmuseum.org [9] and Aeroflight [10], (found on page 1 of a google search for Bristol Industrial Musuem) all also say its free (none of the others gave pricing information).

So, I'd say that its free and the icon needs changing – which I've done. Thryduulf 01:01, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

It was definitely free the last time I went in, which was less than five weeks ago. --rbrwr^± 07:03, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Area/population

I just backed out 81.129.117.239's changes, which turned the "population" table cell to gibberish and also more than doubled Bristol's area. I'm not sure what was intended. --rbrwr^± 19:53, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Propose splitting industry

I'm not happy with having a Bristol Cars section (nowhere near notable enough for a whole section on the front page IMO). I propose we split a new page, Industry in Bristol, Industry of Bristol or possibly Economy of Bristol, which will have info on the cars and aeronautics with the option to expand into any other notable industry. We can then turn the cars and aeronautics section on the main page into a summary industry section. Any comments or objections before I go ahead? Joe D (t) 17:52, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

-- Good idea Joe D Nigelpm 15:12, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bristol "L"

I thought the "l" only went on words which were spelt with an "a" at the end: Americal, Canadal, etc. Can anyone show proof of other "l" words? --DannyWilde 02:01, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

the change from Brycgstow to Bristol (rather than Bristow) is the most famous (historical) example.--Philbarker 16:02, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

Are there any others? I've heard "Americal", "ideal" and "Canadal" many times, but I don't remember hearing the "l" after any words not spelt with a final "a". One of Daniel Jones's books discusses the Bristol L and gives a different explanation. Incidentally I put a request for verification of the above claim on the page itself, but it was removed in a later edit. --DannyWilde 06:38, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Places of interest

What ever happened to the places of interest section? It was removed on 1 March by 86.136.40.144, but I history does not say why, and there is no sign of where it went to.

I think this section should be re-instated, any opinions?

--Kylet 21:23, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree, its certainly encyclopaedic imho. Thryduulf 21:45, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Yes, that was just vandalism. Revert it. --rbrwr^± 07:12, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Have reverted it back in! Nigelpm 15:11, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Citations

I have never done anything with citations before, and am not sure of the formatting required. One request for citation in the article is for the flower of Bristol - there are many other websites with references to the Maltese Cross, or nonesuch. A quick search on Google Books finds a mention in a flora book, but the content is restricted so I cannot be sure.

--Kylet 11:25, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

The request was made by someone who has a thing against county flowers, has been deleting all references to them, and trying to have the article on them deleted. A citation is unnecessary; there's nothing controversial to be established, and the two articles referred to are perfectly afequate. Don't worry about it. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:25, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Calm down. All I request is that references to the "county flowers" neologism is put in the correct context, otherwise it is highly misleading. Please read WP:CITE - there you will see, very clearly, that you cannot use internal links as a substitute for proper external references. You clearly have a thing about "county flowers" yourself, so don't try to play the "NPOV" card - it just won't wash.--Mais oui! 22:47, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

In the recent article for deletion discussion, while there was a consensus in favour of keeping the county flowers (I was strongly opposed), there was also several calls for the recent, unofficial origins of the county flowers to be noted in articles where they are mentioned. I am more concerned that the county flower mentions remain at the moment in the lead section of county articles. Can someone explain to be why is this neologistic product of a recent publicity campaign should be in the lead section? Bwithh 23:02, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

I see another editor has already moved the county flower reference to a more appropriate place. good. Bwithh 23:03, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

1. It isn't a neologism; its use has been very much expanded by the campaign.
2. I'm not attached to the county-flower concept; I'm responding to the aggressive and disruptive tactics of Bwithh and Mais oui! in their attempts to remove it from Wikipedia as far as they can.
3. I've raised this campaign at the Administrators' Noticeboard, as it seems a clear case of WP:POINT. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:16, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject

I made a little Bristol WikiProject for encouraging improvement of Bristol related articles, if anybody's interested in joining in... Joe D (t) 15:04, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes i'd be interested in joining in, it would be great to see Bristol as a FA. - Suicidalhamster 17:02, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed Merger

Dear all, I have today proposed that the Greater Bristol article be merged into this one. My reasons are that I don't feel the Greater Bristol piece adds anything that shouldn't be covered in the Bristol article. The Bristol article already makes clear that Bristol is a unitary authority, a ceremonial county, a city and a large urban area so, while I would envisage using the population data, I don't see that having a separate article on Greater Bristol is worthwhile. Clearly, Greater London and Greater Manchester are formal entities in their own right and deserve separate articles, but I don't believe the same is true of Greater Bristol. Thoughts anyone. Cheers. Duncshine 11:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

There is no such thing as Greater Bristol anyway. The County of Avon was split into one city and County ("City and County of Bristol") and three unitary authorities ("North Somerset", "Bath and North East Somerset" and "South Gloucestershire"). Greater (city) usually refers to the most of the city, excluding the outskirts. In the case of Bristol, what is realistically the outskirts of the city (for example, Hanham, Kingswood or Little Stoke) are not officially part of Bristol (except in the sense of the posttown) anyway. Nickg1980

Are you going to go through all the conurbations in List of conurbations in the United Kingdom doing the same? Fig 10:26, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Duncshine makes it pretty clear that some of those do deserve seperate articles; not all the others have one. Greater Bristol is the only one of the three border line cases on that page that has an article to itself. I'm inclined to agree that the that the Greater Bristol article doesn't have enough in it to merit a seperate article. --Philbarker 10:54, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Agree with Duncshine. Best to have a single article which describes the different definitions of Bristol, and their differing areas and populations. -- Chris j wood 17:50, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Response to Fig's point above. I think that every article should be constantly reexamined to see whether it merits an article or not. The conurbations listed are a good case. I know the Bristol area well so felt it was reasonable for me to make a suggestion. Can't promise I'll have time to look at all the others but, as long as each is judged on its own merits, I think checking to see whether each conurbation deserves its own article is reasonable. Duncshine 12:45, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Well, what ever you decide for GB perhaps you should also do for Greater Nottingham, a very similar size of conurbation. Bob aka Linuxlad 16:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Greater Bristol is a borderline conurbation, but Greater Nottingham is a well accepted entity --Steve 23:00, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

I think there is probably a larger point about conurbations. I do feel each one should be judged on its own merits. I am certainly not against 'Greater ---' articles in principle. I just don't feel Greater Bristol merits one. I don't know enough about Nottingham, but it may be worth someone putting a merger tag on there too just to see what the consensus is. There is certainly no reason why the consensus should be the same in both cases. Duncshine 09:19, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Proposal: photo contests

Bristol is a fantastic city to photograph, and there are several Wikipedians, and loads of non-Wikipedian photographers in Bristol. This is a proposal to use the Bristol Wikiproject to improve the already high-quality collection of Bristol photos and give all us Bristolian photographers some fun challenges. The proposal is to set up a series of photo contests, where we pick a different subject (either a specific article that needs illustrating, or a specific shot that we currently have a suboptimal image of) and give e.g. four weeks for people to shoot their entry followed by a week of peer review and voting for the best (several contests can overlap so there is always one in the voting stage). As far as I know no other Wikiprojects (yet) have anything similar to this proposal. I think it would be fun and good for Wikipedia, what do you think? How many people would be interested in taking part? I'm cross-posting this to flickr, if you know of anybody/group else who might be interested, please cross-post. Joe D (t) 03:36, 9 July 2006 (UTC) (ps: Since I'm out of the country until Aug 9 I don't plan on getting it running right away.)

Please posts replies at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bristol

[edit] FAC

If I put this put this on WP:FAC would any locals have any objections? Joe D (t) 12:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Population growth in the 19th century

Can anybody provide a reference for the statement regarding population in the 19th century. I'm googling "Bristol population growth 1801 1901" and not getting much yet. I'm worried that since the county was expanded in 1835 the comparison won't be legitimate, and I'm hoping the person who added the statement has a source that takes in to account the boundary changes. Joe D (t) 23:36, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Riots?

There seems to be nothing on the riots in the 80s. These have had a huge effect on St Pauls and the police, also leading to the St Pauls carnival (any mention?)

There is an article, St Pauls riot, on the topic. It has a section on the St Pauls, Bristol article and a very brief mention on the History of Bristol article. Perhaps the mention on the history article could be expanded, and a single sentence mentioned in the history section of this page, with link to the article. Perhaps there could also be a mention somewhere in the Politics of Bristol article, which certainly needs to be expanded with a section on non-adminitrative politics (e.g. campaigning, etc). Joe D (t) 14:10, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rhyming slang.

I was bold :) Removed

The slang term "Bristols", meaning breasts, was popularised in the Carry On series of films - "Bristol City" is Cockney rhyming slang for "titty".^[1]

Because it's covered in the disam page, and not really relevant ot the article about the city. Any objections? --verbatim 15:14, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

I don't have strong opinions either way. It has been added and removed several times. I don't think it's completely irrelevant though. Joe D (t) 16:34, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Suspension bridge image

The Clifton suspension bridge is an icon of the city and deserves to be an image included in the main article. Lumos3 08:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bristol - city

I have problem to understand (for translation to cs:wiki) what means or what is difference in this statements:

Top of page - It was chartered as a city in 1155 and county in 1373.

History - Bristol was made a city in 1542, with ...

JaT 05:16, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

mmm, a number of issues here. The phrase "made a city" is pretty clumsy (IMHO). In the UK becoming a city involves receiving a royal charter: so there's a contradiction. Furthermore, there's no clear reference to help verify any of the dates. I'm no expert on Bristol's local history, but with some help from http://weldgen.tripod.com/bristol-history/ I would suggest that Bristol received a charter in 1155 (but not necessarily to make it a city) and that the diocese of Bristol was chartered in 1542. According to the footnote to Bristol's entry in [City_status_in_the_United_Kingdom] Bristol's City Status confirmed by Letters Patent issued under the Great Seal dated 1974-06-25 -- so I guess from that one can infer that there was some ambiguity before then. I've made edits in an attempt to clarify this. --Philbarker 17:01, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Where to place this sentence

The following was added to the introduction by an anon user:

Bristol has recently been named the second best British city (first was Edinburgh) and the top English city for quality of life by business leaders [11]

I have moved it here because there's no real evidence of the notability of the poll. Certainly it doesn't belong in the introduction. What about the economy section or sub-page? Joe D (t) 19:34, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

"Quality of life" should perhaps go in the Culture section? Fig 19:40, 3 October 2006 (UTC)