Talk:Brian in Love

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Notes saying Stewie is understood

I don't really think this is something worth a mention. If it's good for a gag or the plot, stewie is either understood or not. This is not the only episode where stewie's spoken word is understood.

I laughed the first time I saw those gags. But as I reflected upon the episode later, this question of Stewie being understood stuck out. I doubt I'm the only fan who had a similar thought process in his appreciation of this episode. Cromulent Kwyjibo 20:09, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Questions about the Cultural References segment

Can anyone verify that characters from shows that didn't premiere until 2004 (Foster's) or 2005 (Camp Lazlo) are referenced in this episode? It seems highly unlikely. 67.191.181.150

I'm going to have to take a look at this episode again. I agree with you, this episode was first aired in 2000, but Foster's and Camp Lazlo didn't come on until 2004 and 2005 respectively. Looks like the editing of a major Cartoon Network fan. --S-man 18:31, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

I just read this and it's absurd to think that characters from Camp Lazlo and Foster's Home For Imaginary Friends would be in this episode, being that this episode preimered at least 4 years before production of those shows. Upon reading it, I checked back on my DVDs and the characters shown are all puppets from Mister Roger's. The characters said to be Lumpus and Jane Doe are the King and queen, and the character said to be Coco is the blue owl. I don't remember exact names, being that it's been years since I've seen the show. But I'm very bewildered that someone made such an error. Very curious. xinline88

I have watched this ep. On dvd and the before statement about the characters is false they are not on there, inless, at sometime they edited that part after some time or something.ZeroGn28

I added back the bare Mr. Rogers reference. The Camp Lazlo stuff is just vandalism. Alanhwiki 05:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)