User talk:Brendandh
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Brendandh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some articles that you might find useful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Melchoir 23:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Redirects for deletion
See Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion. A number of redirects you created are being considered for deletion. Personally I have to agree, as titles like "The 10th" can refer to many things other than one specific person. Hope this helps, -- Infrogmation 18:38, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Redirect
Hi there; the correct format is #REDIRECT article. Capitalisation and spacing is critical.--Anthony.bradbury 13:19, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] James VI
Well done!
--Amandajm 22:00, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] English people
The English people article simply claims that they can trace their heritage back to the ancient Britons, I don't understand why this is at all contentious. There is no doubt that English people are descended from ancient Britons, there's plenty of research to back this up. It is also true that many archaeologists claim to see continuity in the record throughout the period, indicating an indigenous influence on Anglo-Saxon culture. Nowhere in the article does it claim that Angles spoke Welsh. I fail to understand why it is not obvious that English peple are the product of the fusing of two cultures, that of the indigenous Brythonic peoples and that of the incoming Germanic peoples. I think I can find a reference to support this claim in Britain AD by Francis Pryor. Please don't make this sort of very big change to an article before getting consensus on the talk page. All the best. Alun 05:16, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Anne, 3rd Duchess of Hamilton
Sounds good! Happy editing. :) --Fang Aili talk 22:33, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] French Garde du Corps
There's some bits and bobs from Susane's History of the French Cavalry in the Maison du Roi piece, but I think you already have more in Garde du Corps (France). The book I got my info from is L.A.V.V. Susane, Histoire de la cavalerie française; the Gardes du Corps are in volume one mainly, but it doesn't have much information beyond when and how they were created, uniforms, mottos and commanders. I don't know if you've tried Gallica: the subject catalogue doesn't have anything under "Gardes du Corps" or "Garde et maison militaire du roi", but that doesn't mean that there isn't anything. If you're looking for particular people, it might be helpful. There are no end of C19th periodicals on there. Apparently there's an ancient book by one Francisque Michel, Les Ecossais en France et les Francais en Ecosse (2 vols, 1862), which gets quoted quite often. Contamine's piece on Bernard Stewart, Lord of Aubigny quotes an article he wrote in Grant Simpson (ed.) The Scottish Soldier Abroad, 1247–1967 (Edinburgh, 1992), which should at least be easier to find than some antique from 1862. Probably not really helpful. If there's anything I can do, let me know. All the best, Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Manual of Style
He :) would you please pay more attention to Wikipedia:Guide to layout (especially Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles#Lead section) in your further contributions. Thanks and Greetings Phoe 16:09, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Ho ... here an additional info: please read Help:Edit summary. Best wishes ~~ Phoe talk 23:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC) ~~
-
- OK and no problem. Happy Birthday afterwards!
- PS.: It may look good but it is definitly too much code ... so I don't use it every time :-) Phoe 00:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome!
Hi, and welcome to the Biography WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of biographies.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.
There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
- Starting some new articles? Our article structure tips outlines some things to include.
- Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every biography article in Wikipedia.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! plange 01:07, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:DukeHamilton.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DukeHamilton.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:05, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:GrandadHamilton.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:GrandadHamilton.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Policy
I suggest you read the wiki Manual of style with regard to not including knighthoods for peers. Wiki articles should follow wiki style or policy guidelines so I will have to revert changes that go against them.
As to the Dukedom you're mistaken about the the remainder. Even assuming N could under peerage law confirm someone who is not the heir under the remainder to the title (which he couldn't in strict law) it would still not be held by the present duke. The clear claimant to the title is the present Earl of Derby as heir general under the terms of the original creation. Setting that aside to play fiction and assume that N restored the original title it would, under the original remainder, have descended to the daughter of the 12th Duke and her heirs male then female. It would not have jumped back all the way to the decendants of the 4th Duke this is french peerage law not scottish it was not to heirs male whatsoever. Most authorities maintain that Ns actions were a new creation which would under the law of the time be heirs male again in its french meaning not Scottish and so have become extinct with his death.Alci12 22:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Scottish national identity
I've opened a Request for Comment on Scottish national identity. As an editor with previous involvement in this article, you may wish to add a statement or comment. Best wishes, --YFB ¿ 18:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Scottish Cuisine
Hi, I'd appreciate your input on the Scottish cuisine talk page, further to our wee exchange earlier. I think there's room for compromise on this article. It is far from my intention to talk down about Scottish food and I recognise that my choice of words ("hearty") didn't adequately describe the real situation. I've suggested a way forward on the talk page of the article - let me know what you think! Thanks, Nach0king 13:50, 10 December 2006 (UTC)