User talk:Breed Zona
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Thanks
Thank you for your work on desire (manga), I really appreciated that you put the image on the box.Angel,Isaac 19:20, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- You're welcome. I like working with obscure articles to even out the quality of Wikipedia. Breed Zona 22:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] About Me
Like you I also like to focus on articles that are least noticed, I also do not like to edit long articles that are well developed. I also like to create new articles about things such as mangas, authors, video games etc...I do not know what it is, I guess I am more attracted to things that are not noticed by many people. For example I provided a lot of information about the discography of patrice Rushen and Stacey Q. Two great singers who fall on the obscure list. Please go to my page, I have a lot subjects there that you might want contribute to. See Ya! And again thank you for your help on desire (manga).Angel,Isaac 18:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] And one more thing
I did not know you answered my first message because you did not send me another message back to me. Could you do that so that I know next time, See Ya!Angel,Isaac 18:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Great Work
I saw your work on Dandelion Wine, and you are doing a great work on it. I did not read the about the chapters becuase I did not want to spoil the book because I might read it later on. I added the spoiler warning alerts for you, keep on doing the good work. See ya! and thanks again for your help and your work on yellow (manga).Angel,Isaac 16:43, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User:Breed Zona/Dandelion Wine
Hi! The reason I reverted that change is that the same IP was on a vandalism spree at that point, and is now blocked for 24 hours. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 19:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
No problem. I generally assume that an anon IP editing a user page is probably vandalism, but that edit seemed pretty benign, so if it hadn't been for the ongoing vandalism spree I would have just sent you a note instead of reverting it. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 19:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome to Novels WikiProject
Hi, and welcome to the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to fiction books often referred to as "Novels".
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated quite regularly. You can watch it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WikiProject_Novels_announcements}} there.
While you are updating your userpage, don't forget our userbox {{User WikiProject Novels}}. - The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but other methods are available.
There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
- Starting some new articles? Our article structure guidelines / template outlines some things to include.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the members, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VII - December 2006
The December 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:20, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] CinCollab
Were you voting for that article? Because if so, please place your name under Support by pasting the text #~~~~. Thanks, Cbrown1023 05:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Citations etc.
Thanks for answering one question for me. The other about references and footnotes. Things are a little ambiguous. but whatever you call them there is clearly a difference between 'footnotes' and 'references'. The 'footnotes' do two things, firstly a short note to expand on the subject in the article but removed to make the main text read more smoothly, and secondly citations ideally down to specific page numbers and lines and paragraphs etc. The 'references' (or sometimes 'bibliography' - which traditionally implies print media) are a list of sources used without linking the source to a particular section of the text and often "without" giving detail down to specific pages. Confussion comes when people somethimes use 'notes', external links, 'references' 'bibliography', footnotes, endnotes, 'citations' etc rather interchangably. Does that help. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
