User talk:Bradtcordeiro

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] The Invisibles

Not sure if this should go here or after the others--anyways, just wondering if The Invisibles page is up to snuff. Thanks for pointing out some of its errors in your edits. Solofire6 03:55, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Civil War

Thanks for cleaning up the citations. I just wanted to get as many added as I could, and I hoped someone would come by and fix it if they knew how. I really appreciate it. --Chris Griswold 18:28, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

It's a relaxing way to spend a lazy Sunday afternoon :)... I've never used this usertalk before, hopefullly it works... Bradtcordeiro 18:50, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:MarikoYashida.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:MarikoYashida.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copy-paste move of Neutron (Imperial Guard)

Please do not do cut and paste moves as you did to Neutron (Imperial Guard). Per WP:CUTPASTE, such moves cause copyright problems. I am undoing this move and you are free to use WP:RM instead. Let me know if you have any questions. —Wknight94 (talk) 11:11, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Ah, I was unaware of that. Since this is an "uncontroversial, unobstructed" move, I'll use the move tab at the top of the page, instead of copy-and-paste. Brad T. Cordeiro
I would've probably done the move myself but it looks like there are other articles with the (Imperial Guard) tag on them. You might want to move them all. —Wknight94 (talk) 17:56, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] zombies

Why do you keep adding the "no source" template to all the MZ covers, which clearly do have sources? --DrBat 19:42, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

They weren't covers, they didn't have titles or issue numbers that a scanned comic cover would have had. They looked like promotional art, but there was no source information, just links to news websites that the files were taken from. Per the license template, "The copyright for it is most likely owned by the company who created the promotional item or the artist who produced the item in question; you must provide source information as evidence of ownership." I realize the Ultimate Fantastic Four covers come from the marvel site and that's my mistake, but the others come from different sites. Brad T. Cordeiro 20:15, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
1, most of the covers can be found here. 2, Marvel released them to sites like Newsarama and ComicbookResources as promotional materials. 3, they all fall under the promocomic template.--DrBat 22:42, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Well, if they have proper sources then when the admin checks the Images for deletion page he won't delete them. Brad T. Cordeiro 00:28, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I could be mistaken, but...

Isn't it just a bit discourteous to edit someone else's userpage like that? Sweetfreek 07:18, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, I certainly didn't want to step on anyone's toes. I didn't change any content, I was doing disambiguation link repair and your Dravidian link pointed to a disambiguation page instead of the Dravidian people page that you were seemingly referencing.

[edit] Links on Indian architecture

Hi, saw your comments inserted into the text of the article. While I share your concern about links being broken, would a better solution be to link to Hindu temple architecture? OK, perhaps that is only an ideal, but in practise I think the Temple architecture article is a poorer quality than Indian architecture. Maybe temple architecture needs improving (take the info from Indian architecture) so that links can go to it instead. By the way, which articles to link to that section? --Merbabu 04:32, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm actually not that familiar with any kind of architecture, I was doing Disambiguation link repair and the page I was working on, Dravidian, linked to the Hindu architecture section on the Indian architecture page. Not knowing much about architecture, I used this link while fixing many articles that were pointing to the disambiguation page. If the Hindu temple architecture page fits better, I won't disagree with you, and I'll work on fixing links again. Brad T. Cordeiro 20:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC) Update: I've clarified my comment in the page, so if anyone wants to make changes regarding it they have a better idea of my intent. Brad T. Cordeiro 04:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Filmmaking

Hi Brad, I just noticed that you've been doing some editing on filmmaking-related articles, and you also happen to have some experience in the film industry. I'd like to personally extend an invitation to join the Filmmaking WikiProject if you are interested. Best of luck with your edits! Girolamo Savonarola 00:34, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Moorish stuff

thanks for the heads up. I actually just copied the reference form someone elses userpage, but I'll fix up the link direction.

--lincalinca 05:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lemuria

Hi Bradcordeiro, thank you for providing this edit. Do you by chance have the book? Sincerely, --BostonMA talk 03:59, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

This is a vandalism warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Drunk dialing, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ← 69.167.97.81 18:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

This is a warning. Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ← 69.167.97.81 02:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Oh my God, get off my back, I hit save page on accident, I have 1000 edits with no history of vandalism. Brad T. Cordeiro 02:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
If it was a mere misunderstanding, then you should have explained your error before. I'm sorry you were confused. However you should not remove warnings from your talk page. Have fun editing your next 1000 articles without committing vandalism. Keep up the good work. 69.167.97.81 02:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Feel free to remove the vandalism warnings if you wish since the edit was clearly a mistake. -SCEhardT 03:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Sorry to cause any discern in your life, it appeared as if you were reverting my edits for no apparent reason. 69.167.97.81

[edit] You're the best

Bless your heart! 69.165.187.96 12:23, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../b/r/a/User_talk%7EBradtcordeiro_0bb0.html"