Talk:Branislav Nušić

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Distract is not a criteria. In graphics is not recommended if portrait looks out of text, or out of frame (monitor, in this occasion). Perhaps you can flip image to the left, and live it on right position? --User:Ninam 01:35, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Nina, I am not exactly sure how it displays for you. Can you take a screenshot? It is general practice to put the photo, if there is only one, on the right. So the text leads, and photo follows. --Dejan Cabrilo 05:56, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Ok, I see what you are saying now. But, the photo is originaly like that, and it would be silly to flip it for artistic purposes, though if you want to, feel free to (it's public domain, after all). Just, please don't move it to the left, it really makes article less readable. --Dejan Cabrilo 06:02, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

In PD, and in some other licenses you may interveine on image, photo, in a fair use maner. --Ninam 06:11, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I know, but I don't think it's too important to flip it, because we are not making a collage here :) Give it a go if you want to. --Dejan Cabrilo 06:58, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

And can you add Pokojnik in dramas, please. I could not find apropriate tralslation. Pokojnik is Nusic's most inportant drama. --Ninam 06:17, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

It's in there now. --Dejan Cabrilo 06:58, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

) Thx !! --Ninam 03:05, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Article Improvement

Please consider my article "improvements" of March 30, 2005, if you please. After all, this is Wikipedia - anyone can edit as much as they'd like. Srdacno, Milan

Milan, you didn't improve anything, you just removed a lot of information. If you want to edit it, please do, but I don't see why you just removed several paragraphs? If grammar is a problem, then fix it. --Dejan Cabrilo 21:25, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Milan, I am really sorry. My mistake. You did make some useful contributions - I missed them. Though, I don't agree with removing anything, please go ahead and replace the stuff you added. I only noticed that there was significantly less text - and being tired, I just reverted it because I thought it was vandalism. Please put back stuff that you added - it was rather good. If you don't do it in a day or two, I will do it, but I guess you want to be credited for your additions :) Once again, I am really sorry. --Dejan Cabrilo 21:39, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Rhetorics

Ninam, what's Rhetorics? Is it a name of the particular book (I know what it means:)? What's the original name in Serbian? --Dejan Cabrilo 04:39, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Dejan, Rhetorics is the science and <quote> the art of persuasion through language. Rhetoric can describe a persuasive way in which one relates a theme or idea in an effort to convince. </quote>, and a name of Nusic's (universyty) book (with proceednings), as same as the title of lectures he tough at Belgrade and Novi Sad universities --Ninam 01:53, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Can you give an original title in Serbian, please? Also, I will shortly (as soon as I get to it), add dates&places of his other publications mentioned, so if you have that info please add it. If it's a textbook, then please list it as such, because "disputes" is ambiguous. Thanks. --Dejan Cabrilo 02:45, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Реч је о књизи расправа о реторици, а наслов је баш тако Реторика, бар издање које имам. Унутра се налаѕе текстови о реторици, кратак преглед историје реторике, и избор из најважнијих говора кроз светску историју (као примери на којима се треба учити). Посебан део је низ лекција говор, писменост, мимика, став... Дакле, није ни уџбеник ни теорија, од свега по мало. Уз Јована Стерију Поповића, једини наш школовани реторичар. Поѕдрав, нина. --Ninam 06:06, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Thx :) --Ninam 06:49, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)