Talk:Bradley Joseph

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
(If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia.
Bradley Joseph is related to WikiProject Composers which has been provided as a place for editors of biographical articles of Music Composers and Songwriters to discuss common issues, discover neglected composer articles and exchange ideas. All who are interested are invited to visit talk page, comment and contribute.
Bradley Joseph is a current good article nominee. If you have not contributed significantly to this article, feel free to evaluate it according to the good article criteria and then pass or fail the article as outlined on the candidates page.

Nomination date: 13 December 2006

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bradley Joseph article.

[edit] Note from author/editor

I am not affiliated with Bradley Joseph, but am an interested-enough party to try and write a valid concise, informative, and verifiable article about his work and career, and have cited all references. If anyone has more knowledge and would like to elaborate, or finds a discrepancy, please feel free to edit this article, or enter your comments/thoughts here and I can edit it. Please adhere to Wikipedia guidelines for biographies of living persons, i.e. Biographies of living people should be written responsibly, conservatively, and in a neutral, encyclopedic tone, with due regard to the subject's privacy, and as much as possible to cite sources that are credible, neutral, and independent. Thank you. Cricket02 06:06, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Assessment

This article has come a long way and has really improved in the last few months. Cricket02 asked me to come and look over the article. Here are some notes:

  • There is no need for a lot of external links. I removed a few of the links, because they did not provide any valuable information.
  • The infobox has a lot of genres in it. Would it be possible to generalize his genre in order to keep it manageable? If more genres want to be discussed in the article that is fine, but we do not want to get too specific if it can be helped.
  • The introduction could use a little more information and length (2-3 paragraphs). See WP:LEAD.
  • I was a little surprised by the tables' colors. Is there any reason not to use "class=wikitable"? Also, the professional reviews would be best linked to from an album's article page.
  • Although the article looks fine with the gaps between paragraphs, it would be best to remove the breaks inbetween them.

This article has the ability to become a good article, – Heaven's Wrath   Talk  21:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC)