Talk:Brad Levicoff
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Brad Levicoff
Not notable, probable vanity. �xfeff;--fvw* 23:23, 2004 Dec 16 (UTC)
- It seems to share some content with this biography of him, and his name turns up <100 Google hits. Not too impressive for someone whose main claim to notability is running a website.
Delete. [[User:Livajo|Ливай | ☺]] 00:10, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
-
- Merge/redirect with Zophar's Domain. [[User:Livajo|Ливай | ☺]] 01:51, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Keep or at leastmerge into Zophar's Domain, if that's notable enough. It was a legitimate redlink from both Zophar, created way back on June 8 04 by User:Gilgamesh, and Zophar's Domain, created on November 20 by User:Vague Rant, and linked in both cases at the time of creation. Both users appear to be exceptional Wikipedians, and this obviously counterindicates vanity while suggesting notability. Zophar gets 83100 hits, Zophar's Domain 27400. Deletion proponents should check out "What links here". Samaritan 01:08, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)- Merge and redirect per Vague Rant below. Samaritan 02:28, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: I don't think Zophar or Zophar's Domain would be notable, either, but they're not under consideration. Assuming they are, this is a biography of the guy. Has the dude done much? Is he notable? If we say that his board is notable, that doesn't mean that he is (viz. JScott). Geogre 02:05, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oh, please, don't tell me I'm going to have to kill your dog too. --Jscott 03:55, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I probably made the wrong move by making a link to a (nonexistant) article on Brad. Besides Zophar's nothing he's done is all that extraordinary. Some of the content here could probably be merged into Zophar's Domain, but a lot of it is simply irrelevant. Merge and redirect. - Vague | Rant 02:19, Dec 17, 2004 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect - for someone whose main notability is a website, 100 Google hits is ridiculous. I am getting more for my website. - Andre Engels 02:49, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Merge, and I want an article on my website too! Waaah. Wyss 03:41, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep it or merge it, but the content stays. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 03:55, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Actually, I added the article. Brad Levicoff and I haven't spoken in years. Not vanity. I just wasn't entirely sure then how to handle his reference. I'd prefer not to delete, and keep it a stub. But if there is concensus to delete, then I prefer redirect, with the content merged on another appropriate article. - Gilgamesh 04:18, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Or merge/redir. Niteowlneils 17:09, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 23:13, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, no merge/redirect: wrong side of the line. Wile E. Heresiarch 16:39, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
[edit] VFD
You can go to the VFD for it, this is NOT the place for it --FlareNUKE 09:48, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Please stop it! This is the way that VfD votes were archived a year ago. It is fine to leave this on the talk page. This is not an active vote for deletion any more. Will you stop messing around with this? Rhobite 16:00, 22 February 2006 (UTC)