User talk:BostonMA/Admonitions
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is for archiving admonitions. Please do not edit this page.
Contents |
[edit] BUZZ OFF!!
next time i see predominant in brackets next to tamil on the BN page...am editing it...how convenient of you not to notice the word 'predominant' and bring it back....
and btw...stop desecrating my talk page with your worthless poop....
buzz off and mind your business. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.174.232.187 (talk • contribs).
- Thank you for making a good faith, constructive edit on your second attempt. Because I see that you have done so, I will remove the warning template. --BostonMA 12:44, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
67.174.232.187 location: Sebastopol, California
[edit] STOP VANDALISING MY TALK PAGE!!
- READ WP:BB BEFORE U HAVE THE CHEEK TO GO TO TOWN ACCUSING PEOPLE OF VANDALISM. IF YOU DONT KNOW WHAT VANDALISM IS GO GET EDUCATED ABOUT IT FIRST!
- YES I DELETED A FEW LINES ON THAT PAGE. BUT IT WASNT AN ARBITRARY DELETION. I EVEN GAVE THE REASON FOR MY DELETION IN THE EDIT SUMMARY. BOLD EDITS AND GOOD FAITH DELETIONS ARE NOT VANDALISM.
- THUS FAR AND NO FURTHER!! IF YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT MY DELETION, GO SAY IT ON THE TALK PAGE OF THE ARTICLE.' —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.180.28.6 (talk • contribs). 8 March 2006
209.180.28.6 Quest Communications Denver CO
[edit] Bannerghatta road
In response to your unsolicited advice and hijacking of the moral high ground you certainly dont deserve -
- woah woah woah! should i say i didnt see this coming. Mr.BostonMA whoever you are, please henceforth, take a look at the real issue and concerns raised before you start harping on the tone. and if caps means shouting then so be it. i'd like to know which parliamentary decree of which country deemed using CAPS as shouting. cite your sources...huh! and that trivality apart, answer my questions
- how can anyone consider www.bangalorepotholes.com and projectmonitor.com as notable?? you guys talk about rules and ethics at the drop of a hat, but you turn a blind eye when someone flouts the most basic of WP rules on citing sources. and none of you are new to WP for me to assume good faith and ignore the lapse.
- how is the condition of a road in some corner of the world encyclopaedic?? and how on earth is an article on Bannerghatta road even worth being mentioned on WP. B'ghatta road is not a tourist attraction like Marine Drive or Rajpath of even M.G Road in Bangalore...it has no claim to fame to warrant a WP entry.
- how can current affairs be worth a WP mention? it is for the newspapers and magazines to take care of. it is not for an encyclopaedia.
- how can you keep talking about nothing but the road conditions and call it 'INFRASTRUCTURE'??
- answer all these and many other concerns raised on those talk pages and then start harping on my 'lack of tact', venom etc.
- and just for the record, i'd like to know where else except in my recent edit of the B'ghatta Road page i have been anything less than tactful and patient?? please let me know. ONE INSTANCE!! let me know of ONE INSTANCE other than this one where i have lost my patience. STOP LYING AND PLAYING TO THE GALLERY. LIKE I SAID, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sarvagnya (talk • contribs). 24 March 2006
[edit] Vandalism
and infrastructural obsolescence that the Bangalore Mahanagara Palike has found challenging to address. A 2003 Battelle Environmental Evaluation System (BEES) evaluation of Bangalore's physical, biological and socioeconomic parameters indicated that Bangalore's water quality, terrestrial and aquatic ecosystem were close to ideal, while the city's socioeconomic parameters (traffic, quality of life) scored poorly.
Stop reverting without proper references to the above part. it is considered vandalism.
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Sarvagnya 18:03, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Background: [11] [12] (note that the text quoted by the user was not the text that was restored.)
-
- WHICH AGAIN IS A LIE!!...MAN! STOP BLUFFING!! GIMME A BREAK!! THE TEXT QUOTED ABOVE IS INDEED WITHOUT ANY SOURCES CITED--I REMOVED IT AND YOU PUT IT BACK(WITHOUT CITING ANY SOURCES!!) YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOUR BEHAVIOUR. [[13]] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sarvagnya (talk • contribs).
Background: The diff cited by the user is a diff of multiple edits by multiple editors [14] [15] [16]. The history clearly shows that Sarvagnya's assertion is incorrect. --BostonMA 23:52, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
user warned --BostonMA 00:04, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
