Talk:Borel summation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I think, there is an error in the formula. Instead of (k-1)! in
Define the Borel transform of y by
certainly one would expect (k+1)!:
Define the Borel transform of y by
Gottfried Helms --Gotti 15:06, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm almost certainly the person who made the original k-1 error here. Before I edit I want to also find a good link for a references section. Sigfpe 23:21, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] A worked example would be good
Perhaps
or
? --njh 04:08, 8 September 2006 (UTC)