Talk:Blue Movie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Unknown This article has not been rated on the importance assessment scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot overview, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film. We are always looking for new members! Join us today!

It is requested that a screenshot or screenshots be included in this article to improve its quality.

A Film infobox needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be updated. For formatting information see the style guidelines

---

[edit] Proper Title?

Should the article title be "Fuck" or "Blue Movie"? It's pretty clear that Warhol's title was Fuck, and it screened at the Factory as such. It was only changed to "Blue Movie" when it screened in a shortened version elsewhere that the title was changed to avoid censors. (IMDB notes) It's been released commercially as "Blue Movie", but I think that's the shorter version anyway. Anyone else have thoughts on this? Girolamo Savonarola 21:23, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

• I know this only adds to the confusion, but heres another link to consider.[1]--Urthogie 19:40, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
• I appreciate this isn't exactly a scholarly answer, but maybe this article is better where it is for the simple reason that we already have another article called Fuck. I notice this article is already neatly disambiguated from there. AndyJones 20:43, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Were it to be retitled, I would presume it would be Fuck (film), no? How hard would it be to re-edit the disambiguation, really? Girolamo Savonarola 21:09, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Another related thought is that maybe it would be a good idea to link to Pornographic movie from the top of this article? AndyJones 20:49, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
    • That's a good point. I think I'll add a notice. Getting back to the point, though, which title has the better claim? Girolamo Savonarola 21:09, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Wouldn't adding actual content to the article be more valuable than arguing about the title? If there's no content, who cares what it's called? —Wahoofive (talk) 22:19, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fuck

To add to the title confusion: there is now a documentary called Fuck about the word. We need to sort this out so we can decide which of these two should have Fuck (film). Or maybe they could be Fuck (1969 film) and Fuck (2006 film). Also, after I made [[Fuck (documentary), someone else made Fuck (film) from a Redirect to Blue Movie into an article about the documentary. Cigarette 02:36, 13 April 2006 (UTC)