Talk:Blokus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] winning the game
I changed the ways ofwinning the game, because it was very wrong. Even if one person has the most pieces on the board, he can still lose. So I have changed it. Samphex 01:57, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Infobox Image
I've restored the infobox image to the previous one, because:
- it provides a better view of the components and board,
- it gives a sense of the quality of the components (a significant aspect of this game, in particular), and
- it conveys more about the experience of play.
My view is that it is always better to provide an image that does these things and that one should always use a close up where possible. Game boxes and promotional photos like the one this replaces are the least useful images, except for games with many different types of components that are not easily captured in a single close up image. AmbientArchitecture 22:22, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I have to disagree with you on that. I'm going to replace the image with the original one, since that shows the consumer what they would see in a store, should they wish to purchase the game. I'm going to move the closeup pic into the article itself. MikeWazowski 05:20, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- I disagree. That may be what the "consumer [] would see in the store" -- if they were standing 10 feet away! -- but what they want to see is what the components look like up close and in play. And anyway, since when is this site about shopping? The other photo gives a better sense of the game, as a game. AmbientArchitecture 20:45, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- And if you'll notice, BOTH pictures are now in the article - the original one provides an overview, while the second is there to provide more detail. The image you added doesn't actually provide a better sense of the game - without the descriptive text in the article about gameplay (which that image is now right beside), it's just a closeup of the gameboard. This way everybody wins. MikeWazowski 22:39, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- I disagree. That may be what the "consumer [] would see in the store" -- if they were standing 10 feet away! -- but what they want to see is what the components look like up close and in play. And anyway, since when is this site about shopping? The other photo gives a better sense of the game, as a game. AmbientArchitecture 20:45, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- And come to think of it: that image isn't the boardgame cover it claims to be, but is a promotional photo, probably taken from the company's website or an online retailer. AmbientArchitecture 21:31, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- FYI: A debate about what kind of image does a better job of "representing" a game has developed recently on BoardGameGeek. AmbientArchitecture 04:14, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Best moves?
What are the first 5 best moves?
There are no "five best moves".
The first best moves, could include the biggest and the most complicated pieces and go toward the middle of the board. Samphex 01:57, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Possible to have all the pieces on the board?
Had someone bring over a copy of travel blokus (the two color smaller board version). Got bored and tried to see if it would be possible for two players to have all their pieces on the board (since there are more spaces on the board than all the game pieces cover). After about 20 minutes of trying I couldn't quite get them all to fit using legal moves, but was 1 piece away. Not that anyone would ever do this in a normal game without playing cooperatively, but is it mathematically possible? Having never played/seen a full sized four color version, can that happen in a 4 color version? Gront 00:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Move to gaming wiki
Some sections can be shortened. The variants part is not necessary here, and can be moved to a gaming wiki. Note that Wikipedia is not an instruction manual. -- ReyBrujo 03:17, 5 November 2006 (UTC)