Talk:Blingo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Move to PCHBlingo?
- Support Aftera all, that is the company's new official name... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Blackjack48 (talk • contribs) 04:01, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support per above - this is not a very popular article and the rename is not controversial, so we probably didn't need to discuss it first though --AbsolutDan (talk) 11:35, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Okay, I'll move it and set up a redirect --Blackjack48 13:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Self-advert
I tried to wikify it a bit, but the article still reads like a press release. Hopefully someone can do something about this. --Alberrosidus 06:25, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed - I've been watching this page for a while, and it's creeping more and more into advertisement territory. I've tagged it with the POV-check template --AbsolutDan (talk) 23:12, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- Zewg search is a similar site to blingo and the entry was deleted. I think the Zewg entry was more neutral than the blingo entry. Also see Blingo's entry on "urbandictionary.com" it is more of a sales pitch. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.159.251.82 (talk • contribs) 19 April 2006.
-
- The question isn't so much the neutrality of the article but whether it's notable enough to warrant inclusion in Wikipedia. Is Blingo notable (perhaps Zewg simply wasn't)? If it is notable, than this article can and should be cleaned up. If not, it should be proposed for deletion --AbsolutDan (talk) 03:10, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
-
- I made a few changes to try to tone down the glowingly pro-Blingo POV. I also added in some additional details on the nature of the service, and the technologies it uses. Some typo and grammar fixes too, for good measure! I'm personally of the opinion that the service is NOT unique or signifigant enough to justify it's presense on Wikipedia, but as long as it's here, the information might as well be good. :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.90.4.81 (talk • contribs) 21:09, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
This article conforms with the net neutrality standard —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.99.138.185 (talk • contribs) 00:37, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- Huh?? --AbsolutDan (talk) 01:14, 22 July 2006 (UTC)