User talk:Black Flag
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hope that you check this. You are conscientious and should open an account. Thanks for the positive input. As you apparently do, I care both about the article and the subject. I was all behind the idea of "heritage not hate", but I'm not down with an attempt to revive the White Citizens Council. Rlquall 01:32, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you!.--Black Flag 07:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] stop dumping trivia
Please stop dumping legal trivia in serious articles. You need to have a perspective about the Civil War and about Wiki as a serious encyclopedia. The article in question is about NAMING the war and none of your additions relate directly to that point. Rjensen 17:31, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- For the record, I have sent Rjensen a very polite WP:3RR notice, which I'm sure he will add to the nice collection he seems to be building:
-
- User notice: temporary 3RR block imposed on Rjensen -- 11:30, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- User notice: temporary 3RR block imposed on Rjensen -- 13:24, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- User notice: temporary 3RR block imposed on Rjensen -- 21:14, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
- User notice: temporary 3RR block imposed on Rjensen -- 05:03, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- User notice: temporary 3RR block imposed on Rjensen -- 11:30, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- Black Flag 18:05, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Review of new ACW-related articles
First of all, I thank you for the time and effort you have taken to create and maintain the very helpful and user-friendly pages on found on your “Hlj subpages.” Secondly, I thank you for your friendly comments today.
Is it your preference that Wikipedia contributors notify you on occasions when they have created/submitted new ACW-related articles?
Very Best Regards --Black Flag 01:03, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- I always enjoy hearing about new articles, although I almost always find them when someone starts linking to them in the 1,400 or so articles in my watchlist. If you have something you want to point out to me, go ahead. You might consider joining the WP:ACW task force and telling them as an alternative. If you have any questions or discussion about ACW topics, you can also send me emails through my user page. Hal Jespersen 15:49, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Request for neutral party
I have asked Jerseyko and Rlquall to take a look at the article titled "Neo-confederate". I have listed some of my objections to this article on the Talk page of the article. Your help is also welcomed. Thanks! --Fix Bayonets! 08:54, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Will defend Confederate ancestors!
Take a look at this userbox.--Fix Bayonets! 02:14, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Please calm down
Take a look at Wikipedia:Resolving disputes please. Arbitration and mediation threats are not going to help, especially when steps in our dispute resolution process would thereby be skipped. Will you please comment on talk as to exactly what you think the problem is with the section? · j e r s y k o talk · 18:43, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding SCV factionalization
Since I quoted you regarding this issue, I think I should let you know I did. (In the discussion, when I am referencing "YOUR OWN WORDS," the term "YOUR" does not mean you {Black Flag} personally, but other editors. In the specific instance in which I did quote you, I provided a clear reference). Thanks! --Fix Bayonets! 05:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
"Will Beback had the courtesy to move this section into a draft page, so that we could discuss and re-edit. I object to your mulish and aggravated refusal to cooperate with these efforts, and consider same to be a violation of Wikipedia good faith policies. --Black Flag 21:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)"
- Will moved the subsection before the RFC responses started rolling in. There is clear support for the inclusion of a subsection on the factionalization in the article, as multiple third parties have said that they consider the original subsection to be neutral. I'm still waiting for those "opposing" sources. · j e r s y k o talk · 21:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- I will work on the section this week end or earlier, time permitting.--Black Flag 22:49, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Naming the Civil War
You have recently edited Naming the American Civil War. I am stepping back from the article for a day or so to avoid an edit war. My request is that you consider stepping in to apply some peer pressure in the interest of civility, NPOV, assuming good faith, etc. It's up to you. -- Alarob 00:03, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
I asked Fix Bayonets! for evidence to back up the objections you and he expressed to demoting the War for State's Rights section. I hope you understand I'm not out to delete the term. I just can't find evidence that it has the standing of the other terms we have placed in subsections. F.B.! and I are talking on my talk page. I wouldn't mind if you joined in. -- Alarob 03:51, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Exceptional
If the claims are exceptional, of course the guideline applies. But the question is whether the claims are exceptional at all. · j e r s y k o talk · 19:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- . . . and you need to read the Rfc rules, which say "Do not continue the debate here" and use the date stamp only, NO signatures. I added a link to the RS#Exceptional claims to the description. · j e r s y k o talk · 19:51, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
If you honestly believe I've violated a policy or guideline, I suggest you report my behavior. · j e r s y k o talk · 20:16, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] You're Welcome!
Remember, they said they were "neutral" ;-) hahahaha
...just your average red-flag-waving, Marx-quoting, "neutral" editor. --Fix Bayonets! 21:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Walter Williams quote at SCV page
I am requesting that someone initiate an RFC on this issue. I ask that the RFC be asked in a neutral manner. The quote has been removed by Will Bebeck. I don't know whether that matters or not.--Fix Bayonets! 23:27, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Request for Help
I have been falsly reported and accused here by User:Jersyko, because of these edits at the SCV page. If you feel that Jersyko's accusations are erroneous, I would appreciate your comment here.--Fix Bayonets! 22:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User conduct rfc
I invite you to comment on User:Fix Bayonets! user conduct rfc, which I started today. Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Fix Bayonets!. Thanks for any input you have. · j e r s y k o talk · 05:06, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
