Wikipedia:BJAODN/Requests for comment/Silsor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< Wikipedia:BJAODN | Requests for comment
You have new messages (last change).

In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute, not different disputes. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: {insert UTC timestamp with ~~~~~}), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 11:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC).

Contents

[edit] Statement of the dispute

This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct. Users signing other sections should not edit here.


[edit] Description

User:Silsor recently robbed the Wikipedia:WikiMoney accounts page of everyone's WikiMoney.


[edit] Evidence of disputed behavior

(provide diffs and links)

  1. Silsor empties the accounts
  2. Silsor beats up and robs an innocent passer-by

[edit] Applicable policies

{list the policies that apply to the disputed conduct}

  1. Wikipedia:Civility
  2. Wikipedia:Faux pas avoidance
  3. Wikipedia:No personal attacks - "Don't steal WikiMoney from other editors."

[edit] Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

  1. We didn't even have a chance!

[edit] Users certifying the basis for this dispute

(sign with ~~~~)

  1. I t-tried to stop-p him, I r-really did, but he... he... protected Harry Potter... *sobs* ugen64 04:32, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  2. Does Wikipedia have the death penalty? -- Netoholic @ 04:44, 2005 Jan 12 (UTC)
  3. Silsor's placement on List of Wikipedians by number of edits has fallen drastically and he's obviously resorting to desperate measures to get his # of edits up again. Soq Puppit
  4. Endorse wholeheartedly - David Gerard 05:51, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Other users who endorse this summary

(sign with ~~~~)

  1. My entire wikisavings--gone! Now what will I live on while I endlessly make random edits in other peoples' articles? Elf | Talk 05:28, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  2. See? This is why I keep my wikisavings in an old sock under my user page. --fvw* 00:17, 2005 Jan 13 (UTC)
  3. Will support when user has 60,000 edits in Gaelic using only the letter û. UgenBot 21:48, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  4. | recommend impalement. Neutralitytalk 23:05, Jan 13, 2005 (UTC)
    Crushing by elephant is (theoretically) funnier. Elf | Talk 23:51, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
    When reading that I imagined a pink elephant falling from the sky and crushing the condemned, which would've been a funny way to execute somebody, both in theory and in practice. --gcbirzan (talk) 00:07, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  5. Endorse wholeheartedly - David Gerard 05:51, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  6. I've been robbed!!! --JuntungWu 02:16, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC) Oh, I have my money back now. Withdrawn.... JuntungWu 04:06, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete.

First of all, I would like to point out the fact that Luigi30 wasn't an innocent bystander, he lied about his WikiMoney amount, because silsor took ψ 20 from his already "empty" account. This obviously makes him guilty of tax evasion. While the above doesn't excuse silsor, it demonstrate that Luigi30 is not as innocent as some people want us to believe.

Secondly, eIf you will watch the recording closely, you'll notice he never threatened anyone, he just said This is a holdup! Get down on the floor and nobody gets hurt! whose first part can be interpreted as this is a delay!. While it may seem far fetched, it could be related to the slowness Wikipedia has been experiencing lately. Therefore, the fact that they all handed him their WikiMoney cannot be interpreted as a robbery and invalidates the evidence of trying to resolve the dispute. gcbirzan (talk) 12:00, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

  1. gcbirzan (talk) 12:00, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC) You know, everybody keeps talking about this as it's already been established that silsor is guilty, even before the trial! Oh, and, yes, he did beat up Luigi30, but he had it coming for being guilty! Also, out of the four people that support this, two didn't even have WikiMoney at the time, one didn't use it and only one is genuinely interested in the matter. What is the other three's interest in accusing silsor and jumping on the false evidence presented here? Because of the above, and because I don't see anyone asking for their money back, I believe that silsor was framed, and that he is, in fact, innocent!
  2. Luigi30 21:16, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC) I am not a tax evader! He stole my lunch money! That ψ20 was going to be in my account. I just got it changed from λ20 into ψ20 and that guy ran up and stole it!
  3. Endorse wholeheartedly - David Gerard 05:51, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

  1. Maurreen 05:25, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC) Keep him away from the Monopoly money, or he'll take that, too.
  2. Ashley Pomeroy 12:09, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC) A terrible crime; not just against humanity, but against numbers. I love numbers, I always have, I believe they are a primal force of nature, and anyone who tries to mess with numbers deserves the most terrible punishment. "One through nine, no maybes, no supposes, no fractions. You can't travel in space, you can't go out into space, you know, without, like, you know, with fractions. What are you going to land on? One-quarter, three-eighths? What are you going to do when you go from here to Venus or something? That's dialectic physics."
  3. Endorse wholeheartedly - David Gerard 05:51, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  4. Kewl! I gotta get me one of dem WikiMoney accounts. I'll be rich! WikiRich I tells ya! Then I'll buy this Internet thingy and rule the whole stinking world!!!!1!! --Deathphoenix 05:55, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  5. If some wikimoney had been left in circulation, then the relative scarcity would have caused the value of the remaining units to increase. However, by removing all wikimoney from circulation Silsor has effectively destroyed the money, reducing its value to zero. Unless he immediately releases at least a working portion back into circulation, Silsor's 3154 units of (zero-value) currency will therefore have a total value of zero. This is far beyond simple robbery -- it is an economic crisis. SWAdair | Talk 11:58, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Johnleemk

Silsor did not write his defense! Obviously gcbirzan is his sockpuppet. Lynch Silsor as a heretical two-faced liar.

Well, yeah, he's "overseas" moving his money in. gcbirzan is probably just a messenger. “alerante” 19:40, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

  1. Johnleemk | Talk 09:50, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  2. Endorse wholeheartedly - David Gerard 05:51, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cool Hand Luke

Yeah, truly unforgivable, but I suggest leniency because I've counterfeited enough wikimoney to bail everybody out.

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

  1. Cool Hand Luke 12:36, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  2. Endorse wholeheartedly - David Gerard 05:51, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] MacGyverMagic

I'm shocked! I never thought he'd do such a thing. I ask the arbitrators to force him to return all the stolen money and fine him an additional 500,000 units of WikiMoney for the offence to be evenly divided amongst Silsor's victims. 131.211.210.157 14:27, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)

  • Above has been posted from anon IP by me. -- Mgm|(talk) 22:02, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

  1. 131.211.210.157 14:27, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  2. Endorse wholeheartedly - David Gerard 05:51, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)


[edit] Coolcat

No silsor is innocent. Suspect had a pink T-shirt and vanished in the crowd northbound. --Cool Cat My Talk 18:10, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to a vote or endorsement, should be directed to this page's discussion page.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../b/j/a/Wikipedia%7EBJAODN_Requests_for_comment_Silsor_565c.html"