Talk:Birkarls
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Small disputes
- I changed Samis to Sapmians, because I think this would be preferred instead of Samis or Laplander. Thus Sapmian is an inflection for inhabitant in Sapmi (Lapland). United Nations officially uses Sapmi for Lapland, and I argued initially we should have used the non-Scandinavian variant on Wikipedia for Lapland, i.e. Sapmi. What wrong is it to use Sapmian?
- I changed Finnic to Finnish since it hasn't to do with Wikipedia's definition of Finnic, c.p. Gottfrid Holmlund "Kvänland och kvänernas gåta".
- Changed Birkarls to Birkarlians since this is used in research literature.
Please comment before doing changes. // Rogper 15:20, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
The idea of an ancient Finnish kingdom that far away from Finland Proper remains utter nonsense and if this Holmlund individual argues so, it's a clear sign of him being not particularly credible. --Johan Magnus 18:57, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Finland proper is not a definition of "Finnish". // Rogper 18:07, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
-
- At ancient times, it's the only one. --Johan Magnus 18:43, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I don't know what you are meaning. That Finland proper have had more important position than rest of Finland is pure nonsense, too. // Rogper 15:49, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- At ancient times, it's the only one. --Johan Magnus 18:43, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
-
-
-
- That's a strawman argument! Nobody says so.
- The issue is: What does "Finnish" mean in a pre-18th century context, or in this case actually rather much earlier? --Johan Magnus 18:20, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] "Pirkka men" is unhistorical
The "Pirkka men" or pirkkamiehet in Finnish is totally unhistorical and invented in the 19th century. The sources always talk about birkarlar. --Drieakko 15:07, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Some reorganizations
I did some changes to the article.
- Since the correct term is "birkarl" and "Pirkka men" is totally unhistorical, the proper place for the article is under "Birkarls".
- Reorganized the content and added more stuff. However, the skeleton should still get some more meat. --Drieakko 12:10, 13 September 2006 (UTC)