Talk:Bin Laden (song)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

I can't believe there's a page for this song. It's not important at all.

Omg, you created it?! wow, go guys, go!

Now, lets wait till Morton finds this :) --Striver 16:01, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

This song truly is not part of the 9/11 Truth Movement. The 9/11 Truth Movement is the loosely-affiliated group supporting the idea that some entity other than Al Qaeda is directly responsible for the destruction of the World Trade Center; that there's been a conspiracy and a cover-up. This song, in contrast, apparently argues that Bush is (indirectly) responsible for what happened on 9/11, because of his foreign policy - an important distinction. (Honestly, though, it's difficult to say exactly what the song is "arguing," because it's not making a coherent case for anything in particular - its purpose is to entertain). --Hyperbole 00:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] This song is important

I`m in the 911 truth movement. When I heard this song, it was right on. Everyone fights this battle with the tools thier given. He is fighting this fight with music. I do it with words. This song is a valid expression. Its not important to you cause you have bought into the lie of 911.

The Ghost of JFK

Really? Really? Are you guys that stupid? You blame the republicans, conservatives, and George Bush. You have to be super-retarded to believe that. Republicans are better than Democrats. We are better than you. We are moral, we are true to the Constitution. You don't even have common sense. I regard him and the 9/11 Truth people as "not-good-enough-to-wipe-my-fat-diarrhea-covered-ass". --66.218.14.171 23:54, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] YouTube links

This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 05:00, 10 November 2006 (UTC)