Talk:Big hair
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] What the hell!?
Is this article needed? (usigned comment added by User:Blackfield)
Seems kinda trivial, but there's quite a few articles on specific hair styles. Rklawton 20:29, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- I don't consider "big hair" a specific hairstyle.--Blackfield 18:34, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
And if you read the article your implied complaint is answered. Exploding Boy 19:02, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- This article is stupid. Who has ever had the need to find information about "big hair", and if you mean that the articles deal with different hair styles, there are already articles that deal with them exclusively.--Blackfield 19:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- Who has ever had the need to find information about "big hair"
- I would think that an individual looking for information on the history of hairstyles or hairstyling (or even fashions from the past) could find this informative. --Ethii 10:48, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image
To avoid an edit war, I will post here. I believe that Monica Lewinsky is not the ideal candidate for "big hair" as is believed by a certain editor. I think someone such as Dolly Parton would be a better candidate for an image in this article. I'd like to change this as it seems reasonable enough. --Ethii 17:37, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- I checked with Google - and you're right at 10:1.Rklawton 19:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
This is fucking stupidstupid.--Blackfield 15:53, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] History
Should be some pointer to historical "big hair" -- the 1770's put the 1960's to shame... Churchh 14:09, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Second this, large wigs and big hair were popular throughout time and a section for say, 17th century hairstyles would be informative. --Ethii 09:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Claudio
Why isn't there a picture of Claudio Sanchez in the article. I think he pretty much defines big hair in the 21st century.
