Talk:Bhagwan Das

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject_India This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject India because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WP India}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WP India}} template, removing {{WP India}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

Copied from WP:VFD:

  • Bhagwan Das - possible copyright violation -- JeLuF 10:19 26 Jul 2003 (UTC)
    • Original submitter claims it isn't; see talk page. --Delirium 02:58, Aug 2, 2003 (UTC)
      • I think the claim is mistaken - see the talk page. --mav 07:17, 3 Aug 2003 (UTC)
      • I reviewed the talk page and the claim of permission grant is simply not compelling. Ideally, someone should rewrite the page. Unless that is done, I favor deletion. Kat 18:25, 6 Aug 2003 (UTC)
      • The material, despite the FDL issue, is valid -- I will turn it into a stub, and maybe User:Kaysov can improve it shortly. -戴&#30505sv 20:04, Aug 7, 2003 (UTC)



I had contacted people at indiapost.com (the site from which from which i mirrorred the text.) and made sure that i am not violating any copyright laws by mirroring it. so i guess, the problem subsides.

User:kaysov

But did they give permission to release their text under terms of our license? I'm restoring the copyvio notice until we know for sure. --mav 07:05, 3 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Yeah -- Wikipedia is not a mirror Kaysov -- text here becomes "ours" -- not traceable to any patentable source. If they chose to release the text for "free use" or "fair use" -- a more common term -- then that would be acceptible. -戴&#30505sv 19:52, Aug 7, 2003 (UTC)