Talk:Beriev Aircraft Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was no move Part Deux 19:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Requested move

Beriev Aircraft Company → Beriev — more common usage; brings in line with other ex-Soviet design bureaus —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 23:53, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Add  * '''Support'''  or  * '''Oppose'''  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

• Support —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 23:53, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose —ISasha 13:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - WP:RM is not a vote, but a discussion, just like WP:AFD. Please state your reasoning. Patstuart^talk|edits 03:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  • I was the one who called the vote; That RFV stated my reason. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 05:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose - their English web site uses the full form --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 07:54, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose, the full form is much clearer, unlikely to be confused with one of their products or its founder. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gene Nygaard (talk • contribs).

[edit] Discussion

Add any additional comments:

What's the problem with moving, as long as you keep a redirect from the present title? go ahead, no need to poll... I'm not moving it myself as I don't care which of the two ways it is named. --BACbKA 09:27, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.