Talk:Bel decomposition

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Physics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.

This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Physics because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Physics}} template, removing {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Advice to stub expanders (probably myself, when I find time)

  1. general first, specific later
    • n dimensions first, 1+3 later
  2. nontechnical first, technical later
    • mention role of Lluis Bel in first paragraph
    • in later technical paragraphs:
      • relate to matrix decomposition in MTW exercise
      • explain physical interpretation in gtr in a frame of the three pieces
      • make sure to contrast roles of frame and congruence in interpretation; choice of frame field adds additional geometric structure to the congruence
  3. add good citations at the end (original paper by Bel, MTW, plus some useful eprints on arXiv) in standard WikiProject GTR format

---CH (talk) 21:58, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Students beware

I created the original version of this article and had been monitoring it, but I am leaving the WP and am now abandoning this article to its fate.

Just wanted to provide notice that I am only responsible (in part) for the last version I edited; see User:Hillman/Archive.

I emphatically do not vouch for anything you might see in more recent versions.

Good luck in your seach for information, regardless!---CH 22:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)