Talk:Battrick
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Computer and video games, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
CVG To-do:
|
||
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-08-04. The result of the discussion was No consensus. |
This article is under risk of deletion unless someone can find a review or something on it from a reliable source ASAP! --JRA WestyQld2 23:59, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Notability has been cleared up before, please make sure to check external links, read WP:SOFTWARE/WP:WEB and post a message on my talk page before you tag this article for deletion. Thank you! --JRA WestyQld2 07:25, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Please provide evidence of how it is notable. --Peephole 12:12, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- It is under external links, where notability always is! As I said it passes criteria #3 of WP:WEB:
The software has been verifiably the subject of non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the software developer, such as a major media news piece, a book, a peer-reviewed scientific publication, or an article in a reputed technical magazine. A single such publication that is specifically about the software is sufficient; for publications that mention the software while not being specifically about them, and for publications of lower profile (such as a local newspaper or an e-zine), multiple such works are needed.
As well as #1 of WP:SOFTWARE
The content is distributed via a site which is both well known and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster
Since you will not remove the tag I will remove it until you can find a valid reason to why the article should be deleted, I have noticed in the last week you have been tagging quite a few browser based game articles, perhaps you are not reading throughout the articles before you post the tag or you haven't read the guidlines (Yes, not strict rules) of notability for Software and Web properly. --JRA WestyQld2 01:50, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
The external links show it is not trivial and rather a solid reputable game.User:ads_afc 7th August 2006
I think that standard for notability is clearly met for this game. As the external links establish, it has been mentioned prominently by other non-trivial artciles about the game. --Jonaustin 02:11, 4 August 2004 (UTC)
- Please voice your opinion here --JRA WestyQld2 01:03, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User Template
If anyone has any better userboxes please post them, but I have created Template:User Battrick --JRA WestyQld2 08:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Is this amount right?
Each team starts with a token (virtual!) budget of 50,000 pounds
Thought starting amount was 200,000 or is this a ref to the FC subsidy?
Also - the text seems confusing as to number of weeks (first instance near top, bottom instance seems correct)
--Auntaggy 15:00, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
It is actually 200,000 pounds, I'll edit it accordingly. Thanks --JRA WestyQld2 22:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
