From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I removed the Published and the Characters section, as the form of publication is already given in the lead section and most of the characters are linked in the Plot Summary anyway and it does not make much sense to list them all in their own section. --Fritz Saalfeld 21:11, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)

• A question: Is this a continuation to The Long Halloween and/or Dark Victory? Just thought I ask..

Not really, but it makes a lot of references to them.

[edit] Opening paragraph

The opening paragraph is over-the-top in terms of flower-y prose and praise. Can someone more familiar with the material try something a little more even-handed? Matt Deres 01:56, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

I removed part of a sentence from the opening paragraph ("...which comes through most clearly in the romance that blooms between Batman and Catwoman.") because it implied a connection between 'romantacism', which is a literary style, and 'romance', which is not specifically related to a particular movement. I suppose the author might have meant that Loeb was a romantacist in that he likes to start romances in his fiction, but that's not the first definition I connect to the word when it is applied to a writer. I couldn't see how to modify the entry to accommodate both meanings without making it sound clunky. 66.58.231.58 07:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

okay, it was a long time coming, but I had a spare moment, so I went to work fixing some of the problems with this article. Obviously this was only a surface skim, but hopefully the prose is more encyclopediac, redundent phrasing in the summery made smoother, irrelevent information expelled, and the original author's POV and original research removed. ~CS 23:42, 23 August 2006 (UTC)