Backdoor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- This article is about hidden backdoors into most computer systems. For other uses, see Backdoor (disambiguation).
A backdoor in a computer system (or cryptosystem or algorithm) is a method of bypassing normal authentication or securing remote access to a computer, while attempting to remain hidden from casual inspection. The backdoor may take the form of an installed program (e.g., Back Orifice or the Sony/BMG rootkit backdoor installed when any of millions of Sony music CDs were played on a Windows computer), or could be a modification to a legitimate program.
Contents |
[edit] Overview
The threat of backdoors was recognized by the US military when multiuser and networked operating systems became widely adopted. Petersen and Turn discussed computer subversion in a paper published in the proceedings of the 1967 AFIPS Conference [PT67]. They noted a class of active infiltration attacks that use "trapdoor" entry points into the system to bypass security facilities and permit direct access to data. The use of the word trapdoor here clearly coincides with more recent definitions of a backdoor. However, since the advent of public key cryptography the term trapdoor has acquired a different meaning. More generally, such security breaches were discussed at length in a RAND Corporation task force report published under ARPA sponsorship by JP Anderson and DJ Edwards in 1970 (Security Controls for Computer Systems, Technical Report R-609, WH Ware, ed, Feb 1970, Rand Corp.)
A backdoor in a login system might take the form of a hard coded user and password combination which gives access to the system. A famous example of this sort of backdoor was as a plot device in the 1983 film WarGames, in which the architect of the "WOPR" computer system had inserted a hardcoded password (his dead son's name) which gave the user access to the system, and to undocumented parts of the system (in particular, a video game like simulation mode).
An attempt to plant a backdoor in the Linux kernel, exposed in November 2003, showed how subtle such a code change can be [1]. In this case a two-line change appeared to be a typographical error, but actually gave the caller to the sys_wait4 function root access to the system (see the external link below).
Although the number of backdoors in systems using proprietary software (ie, software whose source code is not readily available for inspection) is not widely credited, they are nevertheless periodically (and frequently) exposed. Programmers have even succeeded in secretly installing large amounts of benign code as Easter eggs in programs, although such cases may involve official forbearance, if not actual permission.
It is also possible to create a backdoor without modifying the source code of a program, or even modifying it after compilation. This can be done by rewriting the compiler so that it recognizes code during compilation that triggers inclusion of a backdoor in the compiled output. When the compromised compiler finds such code, it compiles it as normal, but also inserts a backdoor (perhaps a password recognition routine). So, when the user provides that input, he gains access to some (likely undocumented) aspect of program operation. This attack was first outlined by Ken Thompson in his famous paper Reflections on Trusting Trust.
Many computer worms, such as Sobig and Mydoom, install a backdoor on the affected computer (generally a PC on broadband running insecure versions of Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Outlook). Such backdoors appear to be installed so that spammers can send junk email from the infected machines. Others, such as the Sony/BMG rootkit distributed silently on millions of music CDs through late 2005, are intended as DRM measures, and, in that case, as data gathering agents since both surreptitious programs they installed routinely contacted central servers.
A traditional backdoor is a symmetric backdoor: anyone that finds the backdoor can in turn use it. The notion of an asymmetric backdoor was introduced by Adam Young and Moti Yung in the Proceedings of Advances in Cryptology---Crypto '96. An asymmetric backdoor can only be used by the attacker who plants it, even if the full implementation of the backdoor becomes public (e.g., via publishing, being discovered and disclosed by a reverse-engineer, etc.). Also, it is computationally intractable to detect the presence of an asymmetric backdoor under black-box queries. This class of attacks have been termed kleptography; they can be carried out in software or hardware (eg, smartcards) or a combination. The theory of asymmetric backdoors is part of a larger field now called cryptovirology.
[edit] The classic "Trusting Trust" backdoor problem
"Trusting Trust" was the first major paper to describe black box backdoor issues, and points out that trust is relative. It described a very clever classic backdoor mechanism based upon the fact that people only review source (human written) code, and not compiled (machine) code. A program called a compiler is used to create the second from the first, and that version will usually be trusted to do an honest job.
This paper therefore described how a modified version of the UNIX C compiler could be told specifically to:
- Put an invisible backdoor in the Unix Login command when compiled, and as a twist
- Also add this feature undetectably to future compiler versions upon their compilation as well.
Because the compiler itself was a compiled program, this extra functionality would not likely be noticed, and likewise would not be noticed in software created by it. What's worse, in Thompson's proof of concept implementation, the subverted compiler also subverted the analysis program (the disassembler), so that anyone who examined the binaries in the usual way would not actually see the real code that was running, but something else instead. This version was never released into the wild. It was released to a sibling Bell Labs organization as a test case; they never found the attack.
In 2005 the paper Countering Trusting Trust through Diverse Double-Compiling was published. This paper showed how to counter this backdoor, but it requires a second compiler, and it only becomes apparent if a source and binary correspond bit to bit (humans must still review the compiler source code).
[edit] References
- [PT67] H. E. Petersen, R. Turn, "System Implications of Information Privacy," Proceedings of the AFIPS Spring Joint Computer Conference, vol. 30, pages 291–300, AFIPS Press, 1967.
[edit] Backdoors in the media
- The popular movie WarGames is about a teenage hacker who discovers a backdoor inserted in the Department of Defense's computer system by the system's designer
- The Keymaker in the Matrix Trilogy was a program used to create keys to the various backdoors of the Matrix.
- Part of the plot of the novel Digital Fortress involves an attempt by the NSA to place a back door in an, apparently, unbreakable piece of encryption software.
[edit] External links
- Reflections on Trusting Trust
- Thwarted Linux backdoor hints at smarter hacks; Kevin Poulsen; 6 November 2003; SecurityFocus
- Backdoors removal — List of backdoors and their removal instructions.
- FAQ Farm's Backdoors FAQ: wiki question and answer forum