User talk:Avogadro94
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Howdy pardner! Thanks for the note. rodii
You seem like you know what you are doing already, but let me extend a big ole' welcome your way! --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 21:10, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Thanks for the vote, but ...
Thank you for the support vote, but I'm afraid the rules of the election say you don't qualify to vote. Voters had to have 150 edits before Jan 9th 2005 ... —Matthew Brown (T:C) 21:58, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] On morons (of which you are)
You being a perfect example of what constitutes a true grade A moron should realise that more than one person uses Wikipedia in my distinct home and workplace - you have heard of routers haven't you? Perhaps the fact is you're too stupid to realise when I stated I was leaving I did in fact leave. You, along with Zoe and EurekaLott the self-proclaimed idiots who make this place a joke should perhaps give it a rest and lay off me, I haven't done anything regarding your sockpuppetry and I would prefer for you to leave me alone, I already stated I will not be active on here. I had only recently reappeared to show support to certain editors for the article of the MTV Generation, I have no idea what you're insinuating about myself having voted twice in other AfDs. SO please make sure you have your facts stright before you act like a jack-ass! Piecraft 19:48, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Heads up on User:Chuck_Marean
Don't take it personally, but ol' Chuck took it upon himself to eviscerate your remarks. He does this to everyone who says anything remotely critical. Avogadro 14:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- w/Xpost fm User talk:fabartus
- Thanks for the heads up, but how could I take it personally, all things considered? I've no issue with him of fact. I'm amused he's termed such vanilla language as 'personal attacks'. He certainly seems to use a different dictionary from the rest of us, which is why I put on me 'mediator's hat' and took the time. Well, at least that's consistant with the track record that made me decide to attempt to get through to him by providing a mirror as a disinterested party on the WP:WC. May help if it comes down to an RFC from people with real clashes. All I can do is offer help, but it still takes two to tango. See ya // FrankB 14:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: User talk:Chuck Marean
Please don't undo my archives , or make threatening comments. Thanks. --Chuck Marean 06:45, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, he blanked it again. I'm at a loss as to what to do next.... --mtz206 (talk) 14:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks!
Thanks for cleaning the vandalism off my userpage! --physicq210 18:11, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Chuck Marean
Wow, thanks for the photo. You are correct that I'd mistaken him for a youngster. Oh well. I have had previous run-ins with Chuck also, as have a number of other editors. I must admit my patience for his antics is limited. As I mentioned on his talk page I'm quite prepared to step in with a block if his editing of Personal finances continues. Thanks for the message, Gwernol 15:38, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Nice work!
Nice work on the Cleveland article, keep it up! -- Clevelander 23:30, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
